Photo of me in a kilt with Mr Fergusson!
At one time when the Castle was still a working barracks you could expect to see kilts at least there. Scottish Heritage issues kilts to its male employees but they are not forced to wear them when guiding tourists around the Castle (the same applies at Stirling). But braveheart tourists (I count myself as a visitor rather than a tourist lol) apart a lone piper at the Scott Monument or an employee in a kilt shop doesn't help to fill the void.
I bet you see more kilts at an International match at Murrayfield than you did with Prince Charlie's visitKilts can come out in amazing numbers on occasions, but outside of those occasions is where we have the problem. Yes, historically kilts and Edinburgh didn't go together at least until the nineteenth century, but from that point the two did become merged in the popular imagination to a greater extent. Ozone has pointed out that Edinburgh has tried to capitalise on the highlander tradition and that is because that has now merged with that of Scotland a whole. You are no more likely to see kilts in Inverness now than in Edinburgh but Edinburgh gets far more tourists. When I visited Stirling Castle in February the numbers of people visiting the Castle were pretty few yet we managed three kilts. A couple of days later I stood on the Esplanade at Edinburgh and saw the huge crowds queueing for tickets there. Edinburgh wins hands down in the numbers game so it has more expectations to meet. Your average tourist isn't going to worry about its history of non-kilt wearing, they have seen all the brochures therefore it must be true.
![]()















Bookmarks