X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
10th July 07, 06:48 AM
#1
I also agree with the guys, under the belly really does look gross & a bit slobbish. At traditional level cetainly gives a much better line and look - regardless of girth. Check Mikey's two posted pics for comparison and you'll see what I mean.
-
-
10th July 07, 10:20 AM
#2
I must echo the thoughts of my sizable brethren! Please don't wear it below you belly.. I'm 6'2" & 300#... It is much more slimming to wear it traditionally.
Another hint is to get a set of sporran hangers!!! That way you sporran & strap won't slide under your belly and pucker your kilt.
[B]Paul Murray[/B]
Kilted in Detroit! Now that's tough.... LOL
-
-
10th July 07, 10:50 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Ozman1944
I also agree with the guys, under the belly really does look gross & a bit slobbish. At traditional level cetainly gives a much better line and look - regardless of girth. Check Mikey's two posted pics for comparison and you'll see what I mean.
GROSS AND SLOBBISH?!? (sheds a tear) Perhaps a little unkempt and non-debonaire but still loveable and cuddly!!
Gentleman of Substance
-
Similar Threads
-
By M. A. C. Newsome in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 6
Last Post: 23rd July 05, 01:10 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks