X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
21st July 07, 07:10 PM
#11
 Originally Posted by Monkey@Arms
Since the use of "fashion," or if you will, "nonaligned" tartans predates clan tartans, I think they are just as real as any other, just unnamed.
I agree with this too. One reason I got this is that the complexity of the sett, such as the asymmety in the warp and weft directions, is similar to that found in many older tartans (18th-19th c.) The colors are also similar to those found in some of the older tartans (note that the tartan really appears a bit darker than in the image posted here -- or at least on my monitor). So this is worn at least in part a historical garment, and as the féileadh mhor was worn well before there were defined clan tartans -- and indeed this was true for most of the period in which the féileadh mhor was worn as a practical garment -- I don't have any problem whatsoever wearing one in an unrecognized tartan. As long as the quality of the fabric is good, which it is, it is perfectly fine with me. As I mentioned, I was just curious to find out if anyone recognized it.
-
Similar Threads
-
By emeraldfalconoflight in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 9
Last Post: 26th January 07, 06:29 AM
-
By BLAZN in forum The Tartan Place
Replies: 19
Last Post: 17th November 06, 09:16 AM
-
By Jerry in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 76
Last Post: 2nd February 06, 10:37 PM
-
By furrycelt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 5
Last Post: 30th January 06, 07:39 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks