Cheap formal wear?

[Chef]

In my hypothetical case---what you have is a respectable dark suit---that is the "proper" thing to do; that's why it's a "trick question." Don't take my word for it: ask Judith Martin (Miss Manners) who I'm sure you will agree is the antithesis of whatever-you-like.

I was actually aware to what you were referring. However the idea behind wearing a respectable dark suit in lieu of a dinner jacket is meant for those who find themselves without and who don't have time to get one. It is not meant as "green light" for someone who chooses not to get one. With the cost of inexpensive tuxes or rentals it is unlikely that someone with a suitable dark suit would be unable to afford some sort of tux. The only time a dark suit is considered fully acceptable next to a dinner jacket is if the dress is listed as black tie optional and even then you should wear a dinner jacket if you have one.

An example, dinner jackets are required at our lodge for certain functions. A member would not be allowed entrance if not properly attired. The rules are bent (in the way you suggest) for a visiting Brother who may not be from a lodge with the same rules.

But being well dressed and thrifty is always a good thing. As a working musician, the tux I wore for about 30 years was acquired for less than the pleated shirt I wore with it. Theres a nice sale on tux separates at Jos. A. Bank.

A perfect example of why an inexpensive dinner jacket is a better choice than a cheap waiter's coat for formal wear while you are saving for your formal kilt attire.

[fluter]

I was actually aware to what you were referring.

I was pretty sure that you were! Having dropped that "teaser" for the group, I felt it only fair to explain.