X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
9th June 08, 12:03 PM
#21
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
Sorry, but I disagree. The people who are innocently purchasing "family crests" are being deceived that the arms of someone in the past who may or may not have been their relative somehow belong to them. That sure sounds like fraud to me.
Regards,
Todd
Can you prove intent to deceive?
Legally fraud is an offense of deliberately deceiving another in order to damage them – usually, to obtain property or services unjustly. If someone is buying a coat of arms, how are they being harmed?
-
Similar Threads
-
By macwilkin in forum The Heraldry Forum
Replies: 3
Last Post: 4th April 06, 10:09 AM
-
By Archangel in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 1
Last Post: 15th August 05, 12:01 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks