|
-
27th October 08, 03:18 AM
#1
I think the key is in the club's spokesman's reply...
"He was wearing tiny ankle socks and it made it look ridiculous. If worn in the correct manner we welcome kilts."
Seems reasonable to me. Maybe he should have explained that to the transgressor.
-
-
27th October 08, 07:34 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by greenguzzi
I think the key is in the club's spokesman's reply...
"He was wearing tiny ankle socks and it made it look ridiculous. If worn in the correct manner we welcome kilts."
Seems reasonable to me. Maybe he should have explained that to the transgressor.
That sounds fair dinkum to me too.
-
-
29th October 08, 02:04 PM
#3

now here's a big don't from me, and by me!
I have been following this thread for a while now, and I can't recall seeing other xmarkers post don'ts from themselves, is this just my lack of observation skills or are there simply none/few? Cause I guess we could get a good laugh from some of them, and I think it's always a good thing to laugh a little at yourself.
Come on, we know you got some shamefull pictures hidden somewhere on that drive! now share the fun!
-
-
6th November 08, 03:22 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by Wolf
now here's a big don't from me, and by me!
I have been following this thread for a while now, and I can't recall seeing other xmarkers post don'ts from themselves, is this just my lack of observation skills or are there simply none/few? Cause I guess we could get a good laugh from some of them, and I think it's always a good thing to laugh a little at yourself.
Come on, we know you got some shamefull pictures hidden somewhere on that drive! now share the fun!
There, ah, seems to be some sort of foreign object blocking your left hand. Were you using it to put the fire out?
-
-
29th October 08, 04:55 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by greenguzzi
I think the key is in the club's spokesman's reply...
"He was wearing tiny ankle socks and it made it look ridiculous. If worn in the correct manner we welcome kilts."
Seems reasonable to me. Maybe he should have explained that to the transgressor.
Seems reasonable to me, too, and perhaps he did explain it. The report was in the Sunday Mail, after all!
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks