-
1st January 09, 12:06 PM
#1
low sporrans !
Here is a vintage photo showing gents wearing their sporrans rather low, it seems.
How low do you wear yours?
Best,
Robert
Robert Amyot-MacKinnon
-
-
1st January 09, 12:19 PM
#2
I wear mine higher.
But I (for sure) wouldn’t criticize those men.
I like to show as much knee as does that first man.
[FONT="Georgia"][B][I]-- Larry B.[/I][/B][/FONT]
-
-
1st January 09, 12:23 PM
#3
I usually wear my sporran a hand width below the buckle, or with a waistcoat, probablly about the same place. I almost always wear a sporran when wearing the kilt.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
1st January 09, 01:11 PM
#4
I love a nice sporran with the kilt. I tend to wear my sporran a little lower than others. For some reason it just feels better when walking and sitting.
But I would never let my sporran be longer than my kilt, like the guy to the right in the picture. That would be a bit too far down for me.
-
-
1st January 09, 01:17 PM
#5
The one on the right appears to be an officer (I'm thinking Drum Major), and so would be entitled to a longer sporran. I agree, though, that it should end above the selvedge of the kilt.
--dbh
When given a choice, most people will choose.
-
-
1st January 09, 01:25 PM
#6
Originally Posted by piperdbh
The one on the right appears to be an officer (I'm thinking Drum Major), and so would be entitled to a longer sporran. I agree, though, that it should end above the selvedge of the kilt.
A Warrant Officer, not commissioned. Not a Drum/pipe Major, wrong rank badges for that, so probably a CSM. I think that's the old Queen's Barracks in Perth. The Pipers and the Sergeant Majors sporrans are different. As far the the Sergeant Majors sporran is concerned, wearing it today, I would expect the bottom of the sporran to be in line with the bottom of the kilt
-
-
1st January 09, 02:13 PM
#7
Definately higher than they are. It depends on what I'm wearing. Low enough so that it doesn't get in the way when sitting and doesn't rub on the belt.
Last edited by David Dubh; 1st January 09 at 05:19 PM.
Reason: removing offending comment
-
-
1st January 09, 02:36 PM
#8
Originally Posted by David Dubh
The bloke with the longer sporran looks like he should have used a pony for his hair sporran not a horse, Not tall enough for a horse is he?
But tall enough to earn The Defence Medal, The War Medal 1939 - 45, General Service Medal and The Coronation Medal 1953
-
-
1st January 09, 03:53 PM
#9
I think the problem is that these kilts are all Military rise, while most of us are used to seeing a Civilian rise. Therefore there seems to be more space between the sporran and the belt.
As for the shorter gent being able to get on a horse I have no doubt that he could, I'm not the tallest guy in the world but I've had two horses and have never had a problem getting on a horse, and no I do not use a block and tackle. I'n fact I've seen disabled children get on horses so again no doubt that this gent could indeed get on his horse.
-
-
1st January 09, 03:53 PM
#10
I'm 5 feet tall ... and I can get on a horse (with just using the stirrup). And many professional jockies are my height or in some cases even shorter than me and they are getting on very big race horses.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Sheep In Wolf's Clothing in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 4
Last Post: 5th March 08, 02:08 PM
-
By Shriner in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 7
Last Post: 1st March 08, 08:50 PM
-
By AL-58 in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 12
Last Post: 3rd February 07, 06:51 PM
-
By Raphael in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 3
Last Post: 7th March 05, 07:21 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks