Quote Originally Posted by Chas View Post
Hello All,

Until relatively recently spelling was an adventure rather than a fixed rule. Read any lengthy pre-Victorian monument; the same word is often spelled differently throughout the text. Remember as well that the vast majority of the population could not read nor write. They could, of course, copy what they saw - mistakes and all.

When I joined the RAF in 1970, I was designated as the official signer for a fellow airman who could neither read nor write. I am Charles-Dunne and he was Charlton. At weekly pay parade, I would sign for and receive my wages and would then wait till Charlton 'made his mark'. I would then sign my name again next to his mark with the annotation 'AC Charlton - his mark'.

One last little point, there are only 9 existing copies of William Shakespear's signature - each one is spelled differently. One, he even signs himself a William Shakeshaft. If the "Bard of Avon" can't even spell his own name correctly what hope is there for the rest of us?

Regards

Chas
At the times in question it was not at all a matter of spelling correctly or incorrectly. That was a concept that did not exist until the popularization of dictionaries and public education in the early 19th century. Before then everyone spelled words as they said them or heard them, according to their own lights.

It wasn't that writers copied mispellings. It was that they recorded the sounds of words as they understood them.