
Originally Posted by
Larry124
…[Rules) are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of [Rules] becomes destructive… it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish [them], and to institute new [Rules], laying [their] foundation on such principles and organizing [their] powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their…Happiness.
Where have I heard something like that before?
But rules are not laws and, with all due respect, simply substituting "rules" wherever you want is a form of sophistry that only serves to mislead and confuse the issue.
Thing is...that whether they be rules or laws or even just a simple set of commonly recognized conventions...once you change them, nothing remains the same. For instance (and my apologies to anyone who is Catholic), if you defy the "rules" of the Catholic Church it begs the question, beyond a certain point, of whether you can call yourself a Catholic, at all. You follow?
No one forces anyone to wear a kilt...or to wear a kilt "just so." But we do have, and accept, a somewhat common vision of what Highland Attire is supposed to look like. And when those conventions are violated...beyond a certain point..."Highland Attire" becomes something else. And maybe the kilt becomes something else, too?
DWFII--Traditionalist and Auld Crabbit
In the Highlands of Central Oregon
Bookmarks