X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
7th April 09, 12:11 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by BroosterB1
Up until the last century under garments were very much a thing of the very wealthy. The question, boxers or briefs would have been lost on most people as recently as 1890. The advent of the 20th century and modern marketing moved "long Johns" into a new industry of underwear. Before that, almost every one on earth was "Scottish".
"Are you wearing your kilt in the traditional style?"
"Aye lass, and are you wearing your pants in the traditional style as well?"
So the "tradition" of being regimental in kilts is more a tradition of being not well-off, being frugal, or just not bothering with an extra layer between you and your kilts or pants? So really, the "tradition" and hype of men wearing kilts regimental really got started because it's men in skirts and that's a big whoopti-doo?
-
Similar Threads
-
By rollerboy_1979 in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 32
Last Post: 14th July 08, 02:29 PM
-
By davecolorado72 in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 28
Last Post: 31st October 06, 07:04 AM
-
By Sylvain in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 72
Last Post: 29th June 06, 01:42 PM
-
By Freelander Sporrano in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 21
Last Post: 25th October 05, 12:02 PM
-
By KiltedCodeWarrior in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 5
Last Post: 24th October 05, 02:28 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks