Corduroy X-Kilt

[Panache]

The complications:

1) I anticipate that when I finally pleat the kilt, I may have a hard time hiding the joins (as Alan H says "...they could buy two yards of the 60-inch wide fabric, cut it in half and sew the halves together, end to end....Well, I'm going to tell you NOT to do that.
Why? Because it's complicated. You can't predict ahead of time where that seam is going to fall, and it's complicated to design the kilt so that the seam is hidden inside the pleat").

2) There is the issue of the knap of corduroy being "one way" as the clerk at the fabric store (and O'Neill-thank you!) pointed out. So, if you join it wrong, it looks "upside down" on part of the kilt.

It is necessary to join fabric when using corduroy, because the lines of the corduroy run the length, not the width of the fabric (if they ran the width, I could follow Alan H's directions to the letter). Unless you can get fabric that is about 140 inches wide, you have to cut sections and join them to get enough to make a kilt. Or, you could make a kilt with the cords running horizontally...which would look very strange, in my opinion.

So, next is how I joined the fabric...

[Panache]

I ripped out three sections of 24 inches from my 45 inch wide fabric and pinned them together (along the selvedged edges-no unraveling at the joins!)



Sew them up



With the usual interference from the cat



But, my first mistake. I sewed a little too close to the selvedge on one section, so it showed on the outside. I'm not sure if this picture shows it well or not.



So, I ripped out this seam



More...

[Panache]

I've joined the lengths of fabric, so I've now got about 135 inches of fabric.



With some fairly good seams



But, there is a little bit of a "lump" where the seams are, so I'll iron them out flat



Here's the end product



It looks so good, I'm not sure it will matter if I'm not able to hide the seams inside a pleat! Also, I could not tell if there was any difference between the naps, whether sewn one way or the other, despite what the clerk at the store said. Hopefully, I won't finish the whole darn thing and find out I was wrong!

[Panache]

Because the bottom of the fabric does not have a selvedged edge when joined like I have done (and even if it did, it didn't look like it would make an attractive hem), I decided to hem the length.

So, I marked 1.5 inches (remember, my "victim" has a drop of 22.5 inches and I have a 24 inch wide strip of fabric now)



Then I started to iron the hem in



But realized I had not yet "locked in" the edge to keep it from fraying. My tired old machine does not have an overlock stitch, so I had to run zig zags back and forth and a line of straight stitching down the middle of these. Instead of turning the fabric around when I got to the end of the zig zag and wanted to go back the other way, I flipped it over (so I didn't have to deal with all the material under the arm of the machine.





Next, I finished ironing the edge up and pinned it, checking to be sure it is indeed at 22.5 inches.



Next step...the over apron strip with velcro and the actual sewing of the hem

[Panache]

Now, this is a modern kilt and the hem could very well have been machine sewn, but I, as many know, am an anal-retentive, obsessive-compulsive, perfectionist. I did not want this hem to show. So, just as I did with Panache's Stillwater, I blind stitched the hem. This time did not require as much alcohol to cut the boredom, because I was watching Shogun, and because 135 inches is substantially less that the ~250 inches of the Stillwater. I got comfy in my chair, and sewed it up (I finished in about 1.5 hours).

[Panache]

I've only been able to do a little bit today-laid it out and measured. For reference (and I did ask my subject if posting these measurements was OK first): Waist 44", Rump 47.5" (I am using 48"-it's just easier), Fell 6.5", Drop 22.5". Very close to Alan H's measurements actually

Remember, I said corduroy presented some unique challenges? Well it also has one wonderful quality: the lines are already there, so you don't have to worry about chalking a straight line when marking out the pleats. Just mark on the edge and then follow one of the wales/cords/whatever down to the other edge



Here's everything marked-12 pleats (3"), 10" over-apron, fell line (I just marked on the pleat lines-figured this was all I needed to do). Note that my floor is not large enough to lay it all out at once. Also, you may be able to see on the right, that one of the joins is visible, right on top of a pleat. Sigh. Oh well, I was warned, and at least it's barely visible. Also, note the marks for the A-shaping of the front apron.



I'm probably not going to be able to do more today. Hopefully, the chalk won't rub off too much when I roll up the fabric.

[Panache]

AAAUGH! Just had a horrible thought-went back to the kilt, all neatly covered up with cloth on the living room floor and counted the pleats-I only put in 10! Not enough for 48" (10" over apron, plus 10 3" pleats only equals 40"). So I squeezed in 2 more pleats, but that puts the under apron at only 13" (at least I don't need seam allowance since the edge is selvedged). I'm not sure if this is going to be a problem when it comes to modesty? It should be ok, since it is still wider than the over apron. We'll see.

Hmmmm... 3" times 12 pleats plus 10 inches only equals 46" and I need 48", but I figure I can fudge on a few (or all) of the pleats by a bare fraction of an inch and come out OK.