X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
27th October 09, 02:37 PM
#23
Well, yes, their fees are much less eye-watering than say, the College of Arms.
It is generally conceded that to have any sort of standing, arms need to be granted, confirmed, or recorded, by some sort of government authority. Assumed arms, or those devised by private bodies such as the American College of Heraldry, have no substantive basis in law and are therefore "not recognized" by the heraldic officers in the various offices of arms.
Something that I have always found amusing is the snobbery associated with "who granted your arms". No one office of arms has a monopoly on the nobility associated with a grant of arms. All granted arms are equal, and granted arms have always been the threshold of nobility, one that any virtuous and well deserving person may cross with comparative ease.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Rob Wright in forum Traditional Kilt Wear
Replies: 35
Last Post: 25th February 09, 06:48 PM
-
By MacMillan of Rathdown in forum Comments and Suggestions
Replies: 25
Last Post: 24th October 08, 08:32 AM
-
By Pour1Malt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 117
Last Post: 30th April 07, 12:33 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks