|
-
10th January 10, 09:10 AM
#11
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
I really hope that the kilt wearers of the future, with distant, or non Scots connections, will move on to new tartans and leave the clan tartans to the Scots.
I see some sense in this. The Scottish traditions have been cheapened by poor immitation and that is a shame. It may also be a shame that Scots somewhat abandoned their old ways and language (Gaelic or Scots) in the interest of fitting in better with the English (who do seem to value conformity).
I am, I suppose, American with a Scottish surname and lineage to Inverness shire, and a clan chief who resides, not in Scotland, but in Tuscon, Arizona. So Jock, do you wear a clan tartan corresponding to your surname? If you do, then I do the same. The chief difference is that you reside in Scotland and I do not. Another difference is that for every Scottish ancestor, I have 20 or so who were from other lands, yet the surname stands. If Clan MacBean were restricted to those living in Scotland, then it would cease to exist; there just aren't enough left in Scotland to make it work.
Having argued both sides now, I would love to avoid cheapening the traditions, but also wish to uphold the story of Clan MacBean and Clan Chattan in general. Perhaps we need a new version of tartan - modern, ancient, weathered, hunting, and EXPATRIATE?
-
Similar Threads
-
By ShaunMaxwell in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 3
Last Post: 23rd July 09, 08:58 PM
-
By liv2ryd94 in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 21
Last Post: 17th December 08, 08:31 PM
-
By socalferg in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 23
Last Post: 12th December 08, 08:13 AM
-
By pdcorlis in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 25
Last Post: 8th March 07, 10:31 AM
-
By Graham in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 23
Last Post: 4th January 05, 10:00 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks