Genealogical conundrum

**davidlpope** · 3rd February 10, 07:44 AM

Originally Posted by ThinBlueLine

Would it be insincere to claim these clan connections? Or should the only claimed connections be those that are blood?

I don't think that most clan associations really care at all how tenuous one's connection to a "clan" is. That being said, what is the benefit to claiming these "clan connections"? More "justification" for wearing a particular tartan?
I'm not trying to be argumentative here, just trying to understand what purpose "making this connection" would really serve.

Cordially,

David

**St. Amish** · 3rd February 10, 11:32 AM

Originally Posted by davidlpope

I don't think that most clan associations really care at all how tenuous one's connection to a "clan" is.

Ah, but then there are the ones that DO.

Clan Donald in California requires proof of heritage.

**skauwt** · 3rd February 10, 11:56 AM

Originally Posted by St. Amish

Ah, but then there are the ones that DO.

Clan Donald in California requires proof of heritage.

same goes for the Chisholm clan they have three criteria that must be met before membership is allowed

**macwilkin** · 3rd February 10, 12:19 PM

Originally Posted by skauwt

same goes for the Chisholm clan they have three criteria that must be met before membership is allowed

A number of clan societies do. My clan society requires it.

T.

**sp00ky** · 3rd February 10, 01:07 PM

Interesting...

The Clan Mackenzie Society is open to..."all Mackenzies, their septs, or any of their descendants, as well as anyone who has an interest in the society.

Plus you have to have $20!