-
20th February 10, 12:32 PM
#1
Canada's last WW1 vet dies
Just read in the paper that John Babcock, Canada's last surviving vet from the First World War, has passed away at the ripe old age of 109. Enlisting at 16, he tried to sneak his way into the fornt lines in France, but was discovered and send to a position out of harm's way. Mr. Babcock said he always felt a little uncomfortable about being described as the last surviving vet because he never saw any action. When our last survivng combat veteran of WW1, Charles Laking, died both the British and French governments sent representatives to the funeral to mark his passing and what it meant. For some reason our government saw fit to ignore the occasion. Hopefully they will do the right thing and recognize Mr. Babcock as he is laid to rest. Veterans everywhere deserve no less.
Laurie
The secret of happiness is freedom,
and the secret of freedom, courage
Thucydides
-
-
20th February 10, 06:26 PM
#2
109 the changes in the world that he saw. It is just mind blowing.
Santa Kona
Founder & Chairman of Clan Claus Society
Chieftain Clan Kennedy
-
-
21st February 10, 02:38 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Santa Kona
109 the changes in the world that he saw. It is just mind blowing.
I was thinking the very same thing.
-
-
21st February 10, 12:39 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by RB51
For some reason our government saw fit to ignore the occasion. Hopefully they will do the right thing and recognize Mr. Babcock as he is laid to rest. Veterans everywhere deserve no less.
Laurie, I think remember reading that Mr. Babcock had been offered a state funeral, but did not want it or any other official recognition. I believe that his reasoning was, as you stated, that he had not seen action, and that he was not comfortable receiving an honour that he felt belonged to all veterans, just because he was the last survivor.
"Touch not the cat bot a glove."
-
-
22nd February 10, 07:41 AM
#5
According to news reports, he did serve in the Boy's Batallion in Britain after he arrived in France and they found out that he was only 15, and then he did serve as an adult in WWII. He was far too modest, but that is characteristic of his generation.
-
-
22nd February 10, 02:59 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by Macman
Laurie, I think remember reading that Mr. Babcock had been offered a state funeral, but did not want it or any other official recognition. I believe that his reasoning was, as you stated, that he had not seen action, and that he was not comfortable receiving an honour that he felt belonged to all veterans, just because he was the last survivor.
Thanks for the clarification Macman...that's the problem with local papers, they don't always report all of the story. Stands to reason though, given his reticence about his service, that he won't want a big deal made.
Laurie
The secret of happiness is freedom,
and the secret of freedom, courage
Thucydides
-
-
22nd February 10, 05:12 PM
#7
History channel has a program on right now actually. Even though his recruitment papers state his date of birth as 1900 the back states that he has the "appearance" of an 18 year old and that's all that counted!
-
-
22nd February 10, 06:11 PM
#8
-
-
22nd February 10, 08:16 PM
#9
With his passing, it it is now truly history, but we must not forget.
-
-
22nd February 10, 11:49 PM
#10
If you want a bit more on John you might visit http://cefww1soldierjbabcock.blogspot.com/
-
Similar Threads
-
By Phil in forum Traditional Kilt Wear
Replies: 14
Last Post: 22nd November 09, 06:01 PM
-
By ccga3359 in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 38
Last Post: 6th October 07, 12:00 PM
-
By Oatmeal Savage in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 17
Last Post: 21st November 06, 10:01 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks