|
View Poll Results: Are titles acceptable, Keep them, Don't care.
- Voters
- 134. You may not vote on this poll
-
I like the titles. Let's have a them. They're harmless and fun.
-
Titles? What titles? I haven't noticed them.
-
Don't put no bleedin' titles on me, . . grrrrrrrr. They belong under William Wallace's feet
-
 Originally Posted by robthehiker
This poll is about titles earned by postcount - kilted warrior, kilted elder, grand defender of the kilt etc., not about the "special" titles given out by the mods.
Read post 30 onwards. On balance, I believe that this thread is about the special titles.
Regards
Chas
-
-
I think a readthough of this thread would show this poll is about the titles earned by postcounts - kilted warrior, kilted elder etc., as well as the "special" titles given out by the mods. While the discussion has wandered, this has been re-affirmed by various posts in the thread, some by the original poster. (post #52)
While I endorse the idea that we are all in this forum together etc. One must realize that in any group there are individuals that for better or worse, stand out for some reason. All the "special" titles we had and have were given out to recognise someone's special skills or contributions, sometimes factual, more often tongue in cheek.
As far as someone being a friend of a Mod; online forums are not real life, but just like real life, they are not an egalitarian anthill either. Like it or not sometimes "who you know" can help things.
I know I'm friends with a couple of the mods from those days, and not just "internet friends", we've broken bread. One might suppose that with some of the stuff I go on about on here, I would have had some kind of wacky title, about flatcaps or sci-fi etc, but I never got one, and untill now never really thought about it. And now that I have, I don't care! I've never had a burning desire to have one.
I don't pretend to know original poster' Morrison's mind, but I think the heart this thread was never really about titles as a display of "egos" or "oneupmanship". I have always seen it as a reaction to some of the forum changes, specifically the abrupt removal of titles, and the element of fun about them that many of us enjoyed.
As Morrison said; "AFTER ALL, it IS about humor. The titles and getting them and all!"
Last edited by Zardoz; 9th June 10 at 01:24 PM.
Order of the Dandelion, The Houston Area Kilt Society, Bald Rabble in Kilts, Kilted Texas Rabble Rousers, The Flatcap Confederation, Kilted Playtron Group.
"If you’re going to talk the talk, you’ve got to walk the walk"
-
-
Order of the Dandelion, The Houston Area Kilt Society, Bald Rabble in Kilts, Kilted Texas Rabble Rousers, The Flatcap Confederation, Kilted Playtron Group.
"If you’re going to talk the talk, you’ve got to walk the walk"
-
-
I haven't been around all that long, and probably missed the titles vanishing. I don't mind them, either version.
The post-count related titles are a clever way to show your activity on the forums, rather than just a number.
The mod-awarded ones are fine as well. Certain members make HUGE contributions to the spirit of this board. I find it hard to believe that anyone would begrudge them something as insubstantial as a silly title below their forum name.
As to the idea that "if you're chummy with mods, you get one, otherwise you're ignored"... okay... It's a silly title, seems to me like if you're that hurt by not having one, you should probably get out more (ideally in a kilt )
-
-
 Originally Posted by artificer
As to the idea that "if you're chummy with mods, you get one, otherwise you're ignored"... okay... It's a silly title, seems to me like if you're that hurt by not having one, you should probably get out more (ideally in a kilt)
I knew someone would come out with this. I have made my position clear, I do not want a special title, but I know members who do. My post was to put a different perspective to the thread, yours is a personal attack and I find it offensive.
And while we are on the subject - my question still stands.
Chas
-
-
 Originally Posted by Chas
I knew someone would come out with this. I have made my position clear, I do not want a special title, but I know members who do. My post was to put a different perspective to the thread, yours is a personal attack and I find it offensive.
And while we are on the subject - my question still stands.
Chas
Chas, my apologies. The intent wasn't to offend, nor were my comments aimed directly at you (if they were, I would have quoted part of your post).
My (rather flip, apparently) comments were intended to make the point that the titles DO nothing, are WORTH nothing, and affect nothing. If you don't want a title, refuse it. I'm sure history has some example of a title being turned away.
As to members being recognized for going above and beyond, there ARE some members who make very large contributions that aid many (Jamie and Glen's "10 looks with one kilt" comes to mind, as it is oft-cited as a reference to noobs). If the 'lure' of a title influences more people to commit the time and effort needed to generate these kinds of posts, then I think the purpose of such titles would be well served.
For those who feel 'left out' by not having a title... I really have no response. I just don't see that it is a big enough deal to get upset about.
If a forum member is THAT upset about not being 'recognized'... I guess that IS an argument against titles...
As to giving everyone titles... wouldn't that title just be 'participant'?
I hope I don't seem uncaring, it's just that I don't see the whole issue of titles as a very big deal. If everyone wants them active, great! I think they lend a unique flavour to websites. If everyone wants to avoid hurt feelings, fine, whatever. They don't make that big a difference anyway. It just seems a bit silly to give such a little thing such emotional importance.
-
-
 Originally Posted by artificer
The mod-awarded ones are fine as well. Certain members make HUGE contributions to the spirit of this board. I find it hard to believe that anyone would begrudge them something as insubstantial as a silly title below their forum name.
I guess I must have not heard or been around when all the HUGE contributions were being made. My apologies.
-
-
 Originally Posted by bricekolob
I guess I must have not heard or been around when all the HUGE contributions were being made. My apologies.
The titles were given to members who contributed something to the forum that made Xmarks such a fun & special place, be it knowledge (Matt), humor (Red, God love him), or even rubber chickens. Not huge in the grand scheme of things, but an attempt to build a little esprit-de-corps among the members, that's all.
T.
-
-
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
The titles were given to members who contributed something to the forum that made Xmarks such a fun & special place, be it knowledge (Matt), humor (Red, God love him), or even rubber chickens. Not huge in the grand scheme of things, but an attempt to build a little esprit-de-corps among the members, that's all.
T.
Sorry, but I do not know who you are talking about.
-
-
9th June 10, 06:43 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Now, I may be quite wrong here, but I thought we were talking about and voting on, primarily re-instating the "special" titles. 
 Originally Posted by Chas
Read post 30 onwards. On balance, I believe that this thread is about the special titles.
Regards
Chas
Whoops! My bad. I read the thread a long time ago then refreshed my memory by reading up to post 29 (ish).
-
Similar Threads
-
By sorcererdale in forum Tech Questions
Replies: 1
Last Post: 12th March 09, 02:48 PM
-
By Dirk Skene in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 39
Last Post: 27th February 08, 02:54 AM
-
By Derek in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 11
Last Post: 25th July 07, 03:11 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks