Quote Originally Posted by Bugbear View Post
That does cause me to wonder, as I did in another thread, what would the Lord Lyon have done with someone who had a tattoo of heraldry belonging to someone else, if the inked one were hauled before the court?
I don't think in terms of someone necessarily being "hauled before the court", rather viewing the practice as a matter of personal honour, integrity, and doing the right thing. I would never have someone elses arms, or any type of legitimate heraldric device tattooed anywhere on my body just because it looks interesting, or because I had an indirect connection to it in some form or another. Just doesn't seem correct to me. Now if one is indeed an Armiger, that is a different story completely.