X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
3rd September 10, 08:45 PM
#20
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Generally speaking, the next "generation" would probably difference by dividing the bordure per fess, and the generation following that one would divide per cross (quarterly). In all probability variations in the lines of partition would also be tossed in for the chevron, as well as for the bordure.
I'm very surprised by how many variations one can get, especially with such a simple "undifferenced" shield.
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
That said, Sandy's suggestion of a bordure compony counter-compony is probably the technically better choice, especially if the Herald failed to use all of the options available to him when composing the differencing of the coat of arms. In that same vein I think a bordure billettee argent and azure would probably be a better choice, although it may look like the dreaded compony at first glance. Bastard!

I also think the difference between billettey and compony is more immediately obvious than the difference between chequey and compony counter compony. So, for those who may be following along (and who are visual learners like I am), here's the same chart with the "mystery" shield filled in.
(I assumed it would still be a bordure divided per pale even though MacMillan of Rathdown didn't say so in his description, so please tell me if it's incorrect and I can modify it.)
-
Similar Threads
-
By budd4766 in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 15
Last Post: 16th February 09, 06:25 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks