Curious about the "rules"

[Paul Henry]

Not to go too far off-topic, but that is one of the reasons for liturgical and academic garments.

T.

Actually I don't think that is the case, Academic gowns are worn to show a qualification, or a position within the college, or one of learning.
Liturgical garments are almost always worn to show the postion or status of the wearer.
Both of these types of garments are worn precisely to show the wearer is different from others, they do show some sort of status within the respective organisations, with I would suggest some suggestion that the wearer should be looked up to and respected.

[macwilkin]

Actually I don't think that is the case, Academic gowns are worn to show a qualification, or a position within the college, or one of learning.
Liturgical garments are almost always worn to show the postion or status of the wearer.
Both of these types of garments are worn precisely to show the wearer is different from others, they do show some sort of status within the respective organisations, with I would suggest some suggestion that the wearer should be looked up to and respected.

I'm sorry, Paul, but I have the proof. I am a member of the International Order of St. Vincent, which is a guild for those who serve at the altar in the various Anglican churches. The Order, which was established in the 1880's, is well-respected in the Episcopal Church for its knowledge of all things liturgical. The reference I made comes from its booklet, Serving Basics. My copy is at home at the moment, but I will be happy to provide a page reference when I return later this evening.

While you are correct that there are different forms & items in liturgical dress that distinguish laity and clergy and their roles, the wearing of liturgical garments makes all serving at the Altar equal, and allows the congregation and other observers to focus on the Mass rather than the individual garments of said servers (my summary of the OSV's arguement).

T.