X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
25th February 11, 11:20 AM
#1
I agree with Riverkilt on one hand. Your tattoo is very personal. It's your body, etc.
On the other hand you are getting a tattoo of someting that pretty much belongs to someone else.
I would go with the monochrome and I interpret that leaflet as meaning the drawing of the crest. Background is just that. Background. I don't think the color of your skin enters into it.
If you want color I would agree that you get the clan chief's blessing.
-
-
25th February 11, 11:30 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by gpmeakin
I agree with Riverkilt on one hand. Your tattoo is very personal. It's your body, etc.
On the other hand you are getting a tattoo of someting that pretty much belongs to someone else.
I would go with the monochrome and I interpret that leaflet as meaning the drawing of the crest. Background is just that. Background. I don't think the color of your skin enters into it.
If you want color I would agree that you get the clan chief's blessing.
Exactly -- it does belong to someone else. A "clansman's badge" contains the crest of the Chief, which is part of their coat-of-arms. It only makes sense to respect the customs and traditions of something that is technically someone else's property.
T.
Last edited by macwilkin; 25th February 11 at 11:53 AM.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks