X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
12th June 11, 02:09 PM
#10

First and foremost I'd like to say that it really doesn't matter what others think, as long as you are happy with your arms. That said I definitely think this version is better; the red charges on the chevron really bring the arms to life, as does the galley in base. I still have some reservations about the lion's head on the chevron. On my monitor the shield measures 2.25 inches from top to base point; if you reduce it to 3/4 of an inch (the size it might be on letter paper, a calling card, or the rim of a plate) I'm not sure the lion's head erased would be all that legible (it might be mistaken for a bit of current stuck to the plate).
Since a galley on a gold field figures prominently in M'Donald heraldry, might I suggest you consider doing away with the embattled chevron and blazon your arms simply: per chevron azure and or in chief two swans argent, in base a galley. By eliminating the chevron you would at once gain more space for the swans and galley-- which seem to be the focus of the heraldic statement you are trying to make-- while making the full achievement readable if reduced in size.
As far as cadency is concerned, with this proposed blazon, there are three options: (1) using a black line to separate the bordure from the base; (2) using a chequey bordure; (3) and the instance I would favour, placing a small crescent between the swans. Thus, you would inherit your father's plain coat, and your younger siblings could then difference by bordure in the usual fashion.
Back to you!
-
Similar Threads
-
By be da veva in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 6
Last Post: 8th March 10, 04:52 PM
-
By possingk in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 38
Last Post: 19th January 07, 07:10 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks