-
10th September 12, 06:53 PM
#11
Computers are great when they work. When they don't .....
-
-
10th September 12, 06:57 PM
#12
Pursuant to this unfortunate mix-up, and subsequent inability to recover the thread, I did a bit of digging and managed to find that Google's spiders that regularly scan the XMTS site actually cached the entire thread while it was in the Cooling Off Corner.
While it cannot revive the thread, if anyone wanted to retrieve or see any of the postings from the thread before they are lost into the void of /dev/nul, here are the cached links. I don't know how long Google keeps site caches, so I'm afraid this information may not be useful for terribly long. But perhaps better than nothing. I provide this information in hopes that it may help somehow...
Again, on behalf of the XMTS staff, apologies for this flub-up.
Page 1: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 2: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 3: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 4: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 5: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 6: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 7: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 8: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 9: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Page 10: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=jp
Last edited by CDNSushi; 10th September 12 at 06:58 PM.
-
-
10th September 12, 07:01 PM
#13
Ern, you should see some of the "oops" from Steve when he is working his way through possible spammers! I have learned that some "oops" can be ameliorated by libation, and some you just crawl under a log for awhile. I encourage you to pour yourself a scotch.
-
-
10th September 12, 07:23 PM
#14
Mael,
As an unlicensed psychobabblist, I strongly suspect your inadvertent, errant, subconscious expunction was the lamentable result of a Freudian slip. Furthermore, the last post was in clear violation of Rule 5, so no harm done.
And who said you can't keep a good thread down?
John
Last edited by mookien; 10th September 12 at 07:59 PM.
I changed my signature. The old one was too ridiculous.
-
-
11th September 12, 02:58 AM
#15
They say that there is no use crying over spilt milk, which Tilted Kilt doesn't sell anyway.
Saddle the unicorns Barnes, we'll take this stuff to town!
Regards
Chas
-
-
11th September 12, 03:45 AM
#16
Ern,
As a computer scientist let me give you a little professinal wisdom,
A good operator is forged thru the data he or she has lost. Welcome to the club. Just remember to really foul things up, it takes a computer.
-
-
11th September 12, 04:01 AM
#17
Wait, The Hobbit is being released as a trilogy?!
-
-
11th September 12, 05:43 AM
#18
Originally Posted by mookien
Mael,
As an unlicensed psychobabblist, I strongly suspect your inadvertent, errant, subconscious expunction was the lamentable result of a Freudian slip. Furthermore, the last post was in clear violation of Rule 5, so no harm done.
And who said you can't keep a good thread down?
John
Actually, I'm pretty sure my post was the last one in the thread, and was posted right before it got mysteriously and suspiciously "poofed". It's a shame, because I had spent quite a bit of time in framing a response to the legal/historical part of the discussion and had ensured that I was within the bounds of Rule #5.
-
-
11th September 12, 06:01 AM
#19
Originally Posted by islandkilt
would I be too forward in commenting, perhaps it's just as well...
I agree with this 100%
proud U.S. Navy vet
Creag ab Sgairbh
-
-
11th September 12, 08:23 AM
#20
Originally Posted by Tobus
Actually, I'm pretty sure my post was the last one in the thread, and was posted right before it got mysteriously and suspiciously "poofed". It's a shame, because I had spent quite a bit of time in framing a response to the legal/historical part of the discussion and had ensured that I was within the bounds of Rule #5.
You're no doubt correct. I recall the historical basis for your comments (and they were informative), but I suspect some would argue it was "politics" nonetheless, if for no other reason than references to "original intent" vs. "how I felt when I got up this morning" interpretations of the Constitution.
Besides, I was really trying to make Mael feel a bit better about his Freudian slip.
You might try posting it again, but under the present circumstances, only the Good Lord knows where.
I changed my signature. The old one was too ridiculous.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks