-
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Forget the script for a moment and concentrate on the lead actor. You need a Scot (or at least a Brit who can play a Scot)
The only Scot I can think of off the top my head would have to be Ewan McGregor, of course if you went with a Brit Jude Law or perhaps Daniel Craig spring to mind, but then again with Robert Downey Jr. playing Holmes I suppose anything is possible. I wonder what Guy Ritchie would do with this story, or perhaps Quentin Tarantino But then they'd get Brad Pitt, Toby Maguire, or Matt Damon to play him or someone just as ridiculous.
-
-
 Originally Posted by McMurdo
The only Scot I can think of off the top my head would have to be Ewan McGregor, of course if you went with a Brit Jude Law or perhaps Daniel Craig spring to mind, but then again with Robert Downey Jr. playing Holmes I suppose anything is possible. I wonder what Guy Ritchie would do with this story, or perhaps Quentin Tarantino  But then they'd get Brad Pitt, Toby Maguire, or Matt Damon to play him or someone just as ridiculous.
a young Anthony Andrews would do a decent job with Mad Jack. He did a very good job playing Col. Richard Meinertzhagen in the Aussie film The Lighthorsemen.
Meinertzhagen was just as colourful as Mad Jack was.
T.
-
-
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Look for Fast and Furious 4 hitting the silver screen before we see a big bux war flick about "Mad Jack Churchill".
I bet that is true....
The Fast and the Furious (2001)
2 Fast 2 Furious (2003)
The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006)
Fast & Furious (2009)
In fact, #4 came out back in March, on an average of a 3 year cycle...
Unless you mean the 7th movie in the series, which would be hard to predict, for a myriad of reasons.
-
-
Good question. I'd watch it. How'd you happen across this?
-
-
 Originally Posted by Streetcar
Good question. I'd watch it. How'd you happen across this?
I marched in a parade today, and afterward popped in "Instrument of War" (a documentary on bagpipes). In it, they interview Churchill's widow and I thought his story would make a great film.
-
-
Sounds like his life would make an interesting movie.... I would pay to see it..
“Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.”
– Robert Louis Stevenson
-
-
Thanks for this post. I had never heard of this gentleman, but he sounds like he was one tough person. It would be great to have a movie on his life like Audie Murphy did when he returned from war, "To H*** and Back" is still one of my favorite movies of the era.
"A veteran, whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve, is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life." That is honor, and there are way too many people in this country who no longer understand it." anon
-
-
Any guy running around with a longbow and a broadsword in WW2 is something I would pay to see.
By Choice, not by Birth
-
-
 Originally Posted by Bigkahuna
Any guy running around with a longbow and a broadsword in WW2 is something I would pay to see.
Don't forget about the bagpipes he played in the face of the advancing Germans!
-
-
26th May 09, 02:33 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by Bigkahuna
Any guy running around with a longbow and a broadsword in WW2 is something I would pay to see.
That makes you an audience of one... Hollywood, and by Hollywood I mean the entire film industry, is driven by numbers. And the PRIME NUMBER is the number of tickets sold. If a million people each bought a ticket for $10, that would represent a Box Office gross of ten million dollars. Of that ten million 50% is retained by the cinema owner. Of the $5 million left, a minimum of one million goes for prints of the film and advertising (and that's a tiny P&A budget). The distributor takes between 30-50% of the remaining $4 million, which leaves the studio $2 million. Now if the movie cost $5 million to produce (about one third of the average cost of a film) the studio loss is $3 million.
Carl Stucke was head of the story department at Warner Brothers back in the 60's. On his desk were two signs. One said, "So many good books, so few good movies" and the other one said, "The bucks start here".
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks