|
-
28th February 10, 10:38 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by Tetley
<snip> when does something become traditional?
The definition of the word from the Latin is to hand over or pass on but it would be interesting to find out what xmarkers think about kilt tradition.
One could say, for example, that since Irish Pipe bands have been wearing saffron kilt since the beginning of the 1900s or so, that perhaps this could now be regarded as traditional. Yes, I know that not all Irish bands wear saffron, I'm using this as an example.
The Random House dictionary (via dictionary.com) says:
"tra·di·tion [truh-dish-uhn]
–noun
1. the handing down of statements, beliefs, legends, customs, information, etc., from generation to generation, esp. by word of mouth or by practice: a story that has come down to us by popular tradition.
2. something that is handed down: the traditions of the Eskimos.
3. a long-established or inherited way of thinking or acting: The rebellious students wanted to break with tradition.
4. a continuing pattern of culture beliefs or practices.
5. a customary or characteristic method or manner: The winner took a victory lap in the usual track tradition."
In a stricter sense than, something becomes a tradition when it is adopted as a custom and endures long enough to be passed down to future generations.
And in a more open sense, something becomes a tradition as soon as it is adopted as an ongoing pattern.
In either case, the wearing of kilts (particularly solid saffron or green ones) by the Irish could certainly be regarded as traditional. If a generation is approximately 30 years, then the origins of Irish kilt wearing go back at least three generations.
The Irish kilt tradition is not as well established as that of the Scottish tradition from which it is derived, but I argue it is a tradition nonetheless. Especially amongst Irish pipe bands and the Irish diaspora.
- Justitia et fortitudo invincibilia sunt
- An t'arm breac dearg
-
-
28th February 10, 12:04 PM
#2
Yes, I guess you are right, we cannot escape that we were raised by some form of tradition. My main point it we should not blindly assume that the way we were raised, or the way things are done are the right way, or the best way. We must be willing to dare, for if no one dared to go against tradition, we would not have progress.
Don’t worry, I didn’t expect my views to be accepted by everyone, or in fact everyone. The way I see things is only applicable to me. I can understand how you would see my views as wrong. As a person I am Solipsistic and self-centered. Though I respect everything in the world, I also hold nothing as sacred.
Though this will really insult people, I say it with no shame. If I so feel; I will take anyone’s cultural uniqueness and co-opt it into my own should I think it cool, interesting, or otherwise better then something I already have. Just as I will drop and kick to the curb anything about MY cultural uniqueness should I one day decide it to be of no use or something better comes along.
I am not a slave to history, fashion, culture, tradition, or anyone else. If I wear white shoes with black socks, and someone tells me that for the occasion, it is wrong; I will weigh it against the ‘right’ thing to wear, and if by some chance the way I have decided to dress is better in my opinion then the so-called right way to dress, then I will not hesitate to keep my white shoes and black socks.
To keep it kilt related, I was once wearing my kilt, looking in the mirror, and the front apron came undone and fell to the side, hanging low. I was struck by how beautiful it looked just hanging there, the ragged edge just hanging off my side. There is nothing to say this is an appropriate way to wear a kilt. But if I have an occasion where I want to appear that rugged in a kilt, I will wear it that way.
-
-
2nd March 10, 06:08 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by DamnthePants
Yes, I guess you are right, we cannot escape that we were raised by some form of tradition. My main point it we should not blindly assume that the way we were raised, or the way things are done are the right way, or the best way. We must be willing to dare, for if no one dared to go against tradition, we would not have progress.
Don’t worry, I didn’t expect my views to be accepted by everyone, or in fact everyone. The way I see things is only applicable to me. I can understand how you would see my views as wrong. As a person I am Solipsistic and self-centered. Though I respect everything in the world, I also hold nothing as sacred.
Though this will really insult people, I say it with no shame. If I so feel; I will take anyone’s cultural uniqueness and co-opt it into my own should I think it cool, interesting, or otherwise better then something I already have. Just as I will drop and kick to the curb anything about MY cultural uniqueness should I one day decide it to be of no use or something better comes along.
I am not a slave to history, fashion, culture, tradition, or anyone else. If I wear white shoes with black socks, and someone tells me that for the occasion, it is wrong; I will weigh it against the ‘right’ thing to wear, and if by some chance the way I have decided to dress is better in my opinion then the so-called right way to dress, then I will not hesitate to keep my white shoes and black socks.
To keep it kilt related, I was once wearing my kilt, looking in the mirror, and the front apron came undone and fell to the side, hanging low. I was struck by how beautiful it looked just hanging there, the ragged edge just hanging off my side. There is nothing to say this is an appropriate way to wear a kilt. But if I have an occasion where I want to appear that rugged in a kilt, I will wear it that way.
I don't disagree with your sentiments. Sometimes traditions should be questioned. I have never been one to do something just because everyone else does it. I like to know why they do it.
For example, let's say that everyone in a culture wears one trouser leg three inches shorter than the other (go with me here, I know it's silly). When asked why, one is told because that's the traditional way to do it. Going back through the years, one finds that people have been doing it for a long time. Then, finally, one find's the origin of the tradition. A king had a disfigured leg and the only way to make his trousers comfortable was to cut one leg three inches shorter. His subjects, as subjects often do, began to mimic the practice and cut one trouser leg shorter to "be like the king." Such a tradition, while widespread, really doesn't make sense anymore, but people continue it anyway. It doesn't hurt anyone, but to outsiders seems a bit strange.
Now, how long is required to make a tradition? I would say there is no defined time period. For some, it it's not several hundred years old, it's still a fad. For others, if their father did it, that's all that's needed. And for a few, if you've done it two years in a row, that's good enough.
I would personally say that if the surrounding society has been doing it for a few generations, it can be considered traditional.
We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb
-
-
28th February 10, 01:33 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by CMcG
4. a continuing pattern of culture beliefs or practices
5. a customary or characteristic method or manner
These two seem appropriate to the field in which I often hear "traditional" discussed, that of ITM or Irish Traditional Music.
In the introduction to Traditional Music in Ireland, Tomas O Canainn writes:
"It is difficult ot define and analyse the basic elements of traditional music in Ireland. Clearly the adjective 'traditional' implies that something in the music is being passed from one generation of performers to the next. Most of them are aware of the traditional process to some extent, and of their place in it, but would find it difficult to define what exactly they mean by 'traditional'. Nevertheless, without any knowledge of the history of a piece of music they are able to describe it as either traditional or not on a first hearing. This implies that the music has certain features... which put it, for them, into the traditional category.
Yet one must face the fact that some of the best-known pieces in the traditional musicians' repertoire are of fairly recent origin. They are accepted because they conform is some way to the performers' concept of what is traditional- they "sound right". They have, as it were, dispensed with the years of moulding and reshaping that are a part of oral transmission and have taken their place in the living tradition. The only certainty is that if they are to remain in that tradition they will henceforth be subject to a process of continuous change."
This passage, with only a few changes in wording, could well apply to the notions of what is "traditional" in the realm of Highland Dress to those who regularly see it worn.
-
-
1st March 10, 08:11 PM
#5
Tradition is at its best about memory, heritage, respect, sentiment, nostalgia, comfort and pleasure -- perhaps preservation and reenactment as well.
At worst it is idolatry – a sacred cow, a golden calf, an icon, an asserted "self-evident" argument topper. Avoid those.
P.S. Forgive me if "sacred cow" is no longer an acceptable expression. These days one never knows.
Last edited by Larry124; 1st March 10 at 08:16 PM.
[FONT="Georgia"][B][I]-- Larry B.[/I][/B][/FONT]
-
Similar Threads
-
By ChubRock in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 33
Last Post: 21st August 09, 03:50 PM
-
By davedove in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 69
Last Post: 23rd March 09, 04:58 PM
-
By Christo13 in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 10
Last Post: 16th December 08, 09:30 AM
-
By James MacMillan in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 18
Last Post: 11th January 08, 04:09 PM
-
By Alan H in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 30
Last Post: 24th September 07, 04:07 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks