-
8th April 10, 08:03 AM
#11
![Quote](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by CDNSushi
Semantics aside, what is the difference then between a kilted skirt that's fringed on the right and a kilt (regardless of whether it's for a man or woman) that's fringed on the right side?
I.e. what physical characteristics distinguish the two garments other than the fact that a kilted skirt MAY be fringed to the opposite side?
![Confused](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif) (puzzled)....
Hey, careful, you're awful close to treading on my masculinity here! ![Laughing](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif) ![Laughing](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif) ![Laughing](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
(And that, honestly, is probably the only reason anyone seeks to make a distinction where none exists...)
-
-
8th April 10, 02:42 PM
#12
The kilts I wore in junior school were fastened on the right, the long wrap around skirt I made as a teenager fastened on the right too - it was made from a bought pattern.
The 'rule' that women's clothes should fasten right over left is not found everywhere in the world - kimonos are always wrapped left over right except when being worn by a corpse.
Martial arts jackets, although most can be fastened either way, are fastened left over right.
All the commercially made skirts I have seen which are pleated with a wrap over front - even ones I bought which were described in glowing terms of the amount and quality of the fabric, have been skimpy, flimsy, loosely woven, and where the straps were real leather and not cloth or plastic they have been of low quality, thin, and easily frayed or split. The pleats are tiny kinks in the fabric, and they fall with no regard to the pattern.
Anne the Pleater :ootd:
-
-
10th April 10, 08:00 PM
#13
I can't figure out why it makes a difference. Belts are also worn in opposite directions. Yet I've seen military officers (female) standing next to each other wearing their belts in opposite directions one from the other. If that's acceptable in the military why not else where?
Past President, St. Andrew's Society of the Inland Northwest
Member, Royal Scottish Country Dance Society
Founding Member, Celtic Music Spokane
Member, Royal Photographic Society
-
-
10th April 10, 11:20 PM
#14
![Quote](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Kiltman
I can't figure out why it makes a difference. Belts are also worn in opposite directions. Yet I've seen military officers (female) standing next to each other wearing their belts in opposite directions one from the other. If that's acceptable in the military why not else where?
I've decided it isn't really any of my business which way a lady's apron closes. They can figure that out on their own.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
12th April 10, 02:55 PM
#15
I've read about kilts (worn by men) where the aprons alternate, ie: if one apron is soiled the wearer can bring the under apron to the top to show a nice clean one if desired. So maybe there is no hard and fast rule to this.
The Kilt is my delight !
-
-
12th April 10, 03:06 PM
#16
I believe that chefs' jackets can be fastened either side on top so if called into the dinning room the kitchen stains can be hidden.
Anne the Pleater :ootd:
-
Similar Threads
-
By 1oldsarge in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 52
Last Post: 6th September 09, 08:20 PM
-
By Jennifer D in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 35
Last Post: 4th January 08, 09:38 AM
-
By AtagahiKC in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 16
Last Post: 19th June 07, 10:00 PM
-
By Bob C in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 105
Last Post: 11th March 07, 01:27 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks