X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
8th August 05, 09:05 PM
#21
I'm sorry to hear that, I think it would be decent but I'm not sure if it would be used much or if they could be mass produced at a cost that the goverment would buy in at. The HUMVEE was never ment to be an armored vehicle, hence the whole HIGH MOBILITY part of it and all. I hope the vehicles get out to the troops soon.
-
-
9th August 05, 06:35 AM
#22
Want to cut casualties-and it's the same for both the British and the Americans: forget armour-forget mobility.
It's well trained infantry on the ground-and in sufficient numbers to do the job. I do mean infantry on their very own feet.
Otherwise it is back to the old old problem-better protection-less efficiency-new weapons to defeat the armour-more armour-less effciency--then more thin skinned vehicles to enable movement, and more vunerability.
So back to the Matilda tank-best armoured in the world in 1940-but a minute gun and very slow-thanks to weight of armour: IT LOST.
So to when the governments send either enough men-or pull out-the casualties will continue to rise and rise.
Sorry to be a wet blanket-but that's what twenty years in her uniform does.
James
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks