-
30th October 09, 04:58 AM
#21
Excellent explanations from all. Thank you very much.
-
-
30th October 09, 07:22 AM
#22
Kilpatrick is a place name for an area between Dumbarton and the north-west of Glasgow. The Kilpatrick hills stretch along the north of the River Clyde between Dumbarton and Strathblane. I was married in New Kilpatrick church in the parish of that name taken from the Gaelic "Cille Phàdraig Ùr". It is most likely that the name derived from the place name as many surnames did.
-
-
30th October 09, 11:51 AM
#23
How Surnames Evolved - 101
At the time Tobus is referring to surnames, as we use them today, were just beginning to take hold in Scotland.
Everyone had a first name, and everyone was referred to as the "son of" or "daughter of" their parent. Example: Tom, son of Edward.
As society evolved it became the norm for a person to be known by the name of their parent as well as by their trade, occupation, or a physical characteristic. Example: Tom, son of Edward the Farmer.
Now if Tom had big ears, he might be called Tom Luggs, son of Edward the Farmer to clearly differentiate him from Tom, son of Edward the Blacksmith.
As land ownership shifted from a tribal concept to a feudal concept, two distinct strata of society developed: those who owned the land and those who were tenants on the land. Because land ownership was transferable by sale or inheritance there had to be some way to identify the owner in written documents as well as in everyday conversation. Since land has been named from the dawn of time (The Black Glen, for example) the easiest way to keep track of the owner was to attach the name of the land to his Christian name. Example: Tom, son of Edward the Farmer is given ownership of all the land in the Black Glen. He now becomes Tom of Black Glen.
Now if Tom of Black Glen has four boys (Manny, Moe, Jack, and Ralph) they are each known as the "the son of Tom of Black Glen". Now the oldest boy, Manny, will inherit the land, so during his father's life time he is called "Manny, young Black Glen". As his brothers move out, and get married and have children, they will still be known as Moe, Jack, and Ralph son of Tom. But because they don't own the land, they will be known as simply "at" or "being" in Black Glen. Example: Ralph, son of Tom at Black Glen.
As you move forward couple of centuries Ralph's descendants could end up with either of two last names: Tomsson, or Blackglen. Example: William Tomsson, Lucas Blackglen.
What about Tom, who originally owned the Black Glen? Well, he could have moved on, married well and became the owner of another property (which we will call Fair Meadow). He would then become Tom son of Edward of Fair Meadow. In time his descendants would become either Tomssons, Edwards, or Fairmeadows.
So how does this relate to Kilpatrick and Colquhoun? Here is an imaginary genealogy:
Odo de Brissac arrives in Scotland (remember "de" = "of" in English)
His son Humphry fitzOdo (remember fitz=son) obtains the charter of the lands known as the Church of Patrick (Kilpatrick) and becomes Humphry de Kilpatrick.
Later, Humphry marries the daughter of the owner of the lands of Colquhoun. In order to build a castle for his bride he sells the lands of Kilpatrick to his cousin Rolo fitzWalter, who leaves Flanders, moves to Scotland and becomes Rolo de Kilpatrick. Humphry, meanwhile, builds his castle and buys the lands of Colquhoun, and becomes Humphry de Colquhoun.
But what about the people "at" Kilpatrick and Colquhoun? Their last names evolve in much the same way, with some adopting as their last name the first name of their father or grandfather; for others their occupation becomes their last name; and finally there are those who use as their last name the place where they were born and, in all likelihood will die and be buried, hence there will be Kilpatricks and Colquhouns abounding who may or may not be a blood relation to the first "owner" of the land.
What you have to remembers is that this was a very gradual process, and in Scotland last names were still in a state of flux into the 19th century. Some names are a fusion of languages and cultures with Norman French, English, Norse, and Gaelic all jumbled together in the creation of family names. Example: the son of Thomas==fitzThomas==MacThomas==Thomson.
For a more detailed (and scholarly) explanation of how names evolved check out the Encyclopedia Americana or Encyclopedia Britannica at your local library, and ask the reference librarian for assistance in locating other books on the subject. (The foregoing plug was to remind those who constantly refer to wikipedia that there are more and better sources available AT THE LIBRARY.)
-
-
30th October 09, 04:51 PM
#24
I could be wrong, but it seems that sometimes people from broken clans took refuge with a new clan, and after a while if they fit in and were accepted they took the name of the new clan. Thought I read that somewhere.
-
-
30th October 09, 05:32 PM
#25
Just to throw the proverbial spanner in the works (hmm, I suppose Americans don't know what a spanner is - oh well! Do you say "throw a wrench in the works"?), I just discovered that there was another place called Kilpatrick located on the clan lands of my clan.
That's right, Clan O'Callaghan. Irish. Maybe the OP is one of us?
-
-
30th October 09, 06:40 PM
#26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by O'Callaghan
Just to throw the proverbial spanner in the works (hmm, I suppose Americans don't know what a spanner is - oh well! Do you say "throw a wrench in the works"?)
Hmmm...isn't a spanner what you get when you cross a "lorry" and a "biscuit"?
Cordially,
David
-
-
31st October 09, 11:53 AM
#27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by O'Callaghan
Do you say "throw a wrench in the works"?
Sometimes, but we usually specify that it's a monkey wrench. That's an old-fashioned type of adjustable spanner. It looks like a pipe wrench, but its jaws are flat rather than toothed.
Ah, the names that we adopt for ourselves and our stuff can be fascinating.
-
-
1st November 09, 02:39 AM
#28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by davidlpope
Hmmm...isn't a spanner what you get when you cross a "lorry" and a "biscuit"?
Cordially,
David
LOL! Well a lorry is a truck and a biscuit is a cookie, or if you're from the Southern US, then a biscuit is like a scone, but savoury instead of sweet. It's a wonder we're able to communicate atall.
-
-
3rd November 09, 02:43 PM
#29
His son Humphry fitzOdo (remember fitz=son)
As far as I am aware, Fitz was also adopted by the English to describe a denotation for the bastard (illegitimate) son of someone in high station...
i.e. Kings, Princes...
oh hang on, better back that up...
In later times, similar forms were coined for members of the English and British royal family, who historically lacked a surname, and particularly for illegitimate children of kings and princes (Fitzroy, son of the king; Fitzjames, son of the king James II of England; and FitzClarence, son of the Duke of Clarence). From this later use, it has been implied that the name indicates illegitimacy, which was not originally the case.
Ah, thats cleared that up then.
-
-
3rd November 09, 05:04 PM
#30
Interesting for me. Ingelram became Ingram = My last name, so I can trace my Sept and my clan. I am also a King on my Grandmothers side, so I have 2 septs that I can trace back to Colquhoun.
-
Similar Threads
-
By NancyMan in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 9
Last Post: 27th June 06, 01:04 PM
-
By Streetcar in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 3
Last Post: 17th December 05, 02:29 PM
-
By cavscout in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 7
Last Post: 1st October 05, 02:55 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks