-
18th October 10, 11:10 AM
#21
Bob’s Your Uncle wrote: “It was when the Lowland and English legal systems came to prevail in Scotland that male inheritance became the way property was transferred from one generation to another.”
I understand that King Malcolm III Canmore had most to do with this shift.
He fought a bloody war that devastated Buchan in order to ensure that he would be succeeded by his sons, and in the end six or seven of them actually sat on the throne in succession.
Regards,
Mike
The fear of the Lord is a fountain of life.
[Proverbs 14:27]
-
-
18th October 10, 11:27 AM
#22
Originally Posted by Tobus
Ah, OK. So matrilineal Scottishness really is acceptable by most Scots? I thought it was generally accepted in Scotland that only the father's lines mattered.
Well, Prince William of Wales is the son of the Duke of Rothesay. His paternal grandmother is Queen of Scotland; his paternal great-grandfather was King of Scotland, as was his g-g grandfather etc. etc. A rather "Scottish" paternal line, I would say.
-
-
23rd October 10, 06:40 AM
#23
The Queen, Elizabeth the Second (First of Scotland), "descends" from a Scottish royal line that inherited the English throne on the death of Elizabeth the First (of England).
In that sense, the English nation was taken over by the Scots. If the Scot's queen chooses to allow her English-born subjects of Scots descent to wear a kilt, then so be it.
Don't dig in too deep here, folks, as discussing royalty at length, or in all but the simplest terms, is on the no-no list of the forum.
Slainte
Bruce
-
-
23rd October 10, 09:14 AM
#24
Yes, Bruce, we shouldn’t go too deeply into this topic. But I must say that I decline to refer to Her Majesty as Elizabeth II because she is only the Second of England (even though her title is “of Great Britain and Northern Ireland et cetera”).
Regards,
Mike
The fear of the Lord is a fountain of life.
[Proverbs 14:27]
-
-
23rd October 10, 09:57 AM
#25
Mike
I agree re the Queen's title, though common usage means that her, near, 60 year reign has her marked down as QE2. No doubt her Diamond Jubilee celebrations, which are on the horizon, will bring a few kilties out on the streets!
If it keeps the English happy, so be it. They never have quite understood that they came under Scottish rule all those years ago!
At least Victoria boosted the interest in all things tartan, even though kilts are an ever developing item of attire, whatever "traditionalists" like me say!
Slainte
Bruce
-
-
23rd October 10, 10:17 AM
#26
Just for information:
The convention of numbering was established some time ago at the Queen's accession and it states that whichever regnal number is the highest either from England or Scotland shall be the one that is used.
Separate regnal numbers were last used before the Union.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
23rd October 10, 11:16 AM
#27
And, folks, although this thread has stayed nicely on course, DO NOT be tempted to pass comment on the Union. It's suuuuuch a dangerous place to go...
Interesting point re regnal numbers, though, McClef.
Back to kilting, I do recall being asked by a tourist to strike a pose "a la Prince Charles at Balmoral" one time, whatever that meant! If I had a long walking stick and a bodyguard in the undergrowth I might have obliged better than just looking distantly across the loch I was stood next to!
Slainte
Bruce
-
-
24th October 10, 02:45 PM
#28
But there was never any doubt that James VI of Scotland would be King of England when Queen Elizabeth died without issue.
James IV of Scotland married the eldest daughter of Henry VII, Margaret Tudor, and when the Tudor line in England failed James VI of Scotland became King James of Engand, one monarch, two crowns.
Having already produced male heirs, the eldest could be made Prince of Wales, King James was reportedly greeted with enthusiasm and some relief.
I don't think there is any mileage to be got from the fact that James VI, King of Scots was the heir to the English throne and was treated as such.
Anne the Pleater :ootd:
-
-
24th October 10, 04:47 PM
#29
Originally Posted by BobsYourUncle
name in the registers even after marriage--accordingly, I , and others, have had great success in tracing female lines of descent in the Old Parish Registers, now available online at Scotlandspeople.org.
Just wanted to fix your link www.Scotlandspeople.gov.uk
Correct me if i have the wrong page
-
-
24th October 10, 06:17 PM
#30
Originally Posted by Kilted Rogue
Yes, that's it! Thanks!
"Before two notes of the theme were played, Colin knew it was Patrick Mor MacCrimmon's 'Lament for the Children'...Sad seven times--ah, Patrick MacCrimmon of the seven dead sons....'It's a hard tune, that', said old Angus. Hard on the piper; hard on them all; hard on the world." Butcher's Broom, by Neil Gunn, 1994 Walker & Co, NY, p. 397-8.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks