As someone who writes headlines for a living, I am all too aware of the tendency of many journalists (and often those in charge) to jump for the sensationalist angle and ignore the implications.
This was a report about a man who was drunk. His kilt was a near-irrelevancy (but he was right to take it off before jumping into the creek).
The report is far too brief (well, someone must have felt it did not warrant much space). It states that the man stripped in front of witnesses, but gives no indication as to how many – a large crowd, a few people, male or female, adults or children?
In other words, who was offended by his action?
No mention is made of who made the complaint. Often such complaints come from people who have an axe to grind. And all too often, they are given an opportunity to make a big sensation about very little indeed.
And commenting on the news webpage will likely be unproductive.
Ah well . . .
Regards,
Mike