Threaded View
 M. A. C. Newsome "Hard" tartan 20th March 12, 01:32 PM
 Chirs I would wonder about the... 20th March 12, 01:37 PM
 tulloch Matt, how does this relate to... 20th March 12, 01:41 PM
 M. A. C. Newsome Thanks for sharing that... 20th March 12, 02:05 PM
 tulloch Ahh. Thank you gentlemen. ... 20th March 12, 02:08 PM
 cruiser348 Is "hard tartan" something... 20th March 12, 02:51 PM
 Ryan Ross And the big question is- Is... 20th March 12, 03:16 PM
 M. A. C. Newsome One would think, but alas,... 20th March 12, 03:33 PM
 mookien Matt: That is very... 20th March 12, 03:43 PM
 Orvis Matt - I concur with you... 20th March 12, 03:59 PM
 Orvis Whoops! Typos are noticed... 20th March 12, 04:02 PM
 NeightRG It's funny - the distance... 20th March 12, 07:57 PM
 Jock Scot Slightly off topic, but a... 20th March 12, 11:19 PM
 Jock Scot This is a fascinating thread... 21st March 12, 05:43 AM
 M. A. C. Newsome Kyle, I made a MacPherson... 21st March 12, 07:07 AM
-
20th March 12, 01:32 PM
#1
"Hard" tartan
I received my first couple of lengths of hard tartan yesterday. This is actually tartan cloth woven the usual way (worsted wool) but shipped straight off the loom instead of the usual practice of having the cloth "finished" before sending it out. The finishing process (generally done at an off-site location from the weaving mill) cleans and softens the cloth. This unfinished tartan is generally referred to as "in the grease" by those at the mills. What is interesting to you and me (well, me anyway) about it, is that it comes pretty darned close to the look and feel of the old "hard tartan" cloth of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.
I have started offering it as an option (along with the teasle raised finish) on my heirloom kilts.
I am extremely pleased with how these two lengths came out. One is for a client, in the reproduction (weathered) Forbes tartan. The other is for myself, in the Armstrong tartan. I had the Armstrong tartan woven in the historic Wilsons of Bannockburn colors. I also had them enlarge the sett (it's 11"!!!) and changed the portions a bit to suit my personal taste.
Okay, okay, enough talk -- pictures!


Visually, there is not that much difference between how this cloth looks and the standard finished tartan. Here is a close up of my new Armstrong tartan on the left, with my New House Highland tartan treated with the standard finish on the right. (The green color is the same for both, so I thought it would make a good comparison).

As you can see, not much visual difference. But there is a HUGE difference in the feel. The hard tartan is, well... harder. It's more "crisp" is the best way I can describe it. The tartan has a more firm and stiff hand to it. I will be very interested in seeing how it pleats up when I make these into kilts.
I will also say that the fabric has a more hand woven feel to it. I think that anyone interested in historic reenactment will definitely appreciate this option. Also anyone who wants a more historic themed kilt, or who just would appreciate a stiffer, more coarse cloth.
The flip side of this would be teasle-raised finish I mentioned in another thread, which would be a good option for anyone wanting a softer cloth for their kilt.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|