X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30
  1. #21
    Join Date
    9th March 13
    Location
    Croydon. UK
    Posts
    262
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Whatever they wore, the Covenanters would have been deeply disapproving of the Jacobites and probably seen their defeat at Culloden as God's judgement on their idolatrous religion. (Jacobites were not only Roman Catholic, but also Episcopalian, equally anathema to Calvinists.)

    The Jacobites, by contrast, would have seen the Covenanters as disloyal to the Lord's Annointed and deserving all they got.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    1st August 10
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    189
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    JonathanB
    (Jacobites were not only Roman Catholic, but also Episcopalian, equally anathema to Calvinists.)
    .

    You are quite right of course in that the Covenanters held episcopacy as anathema, and I suppose this is your intention here.

    On the other hand, it does not follow that Calvinists as such held episcopacy in such disdain. There was a group of theologians in the seventeenth century known as the Aberdeen Doctors who were both Reformed and episcopal. Beyond Scotland, the puritans in England who formed the Westminster Assembly were all ordained ministers of the Church of England and had, until 1643 when episcopacy was abolished by Parliament, served in an episcopal church. There were not a few who shared their theology who nevertheless continued in the Church of England after the restoration of the monarchy and the episcopal system in 1660. In Scotland, there was Robert Leighton, who signed the Solemn League and Covenant in 1643 but, without changing his overall theology, served as Bishop of Dunblane and then as Archbishop of Glasgow under Charles II. So, as in many cases, the reality is a little more awkward.

    However, I agree - whatever they thought of episcopacy - that it is more than highly unlikely that they ever wore kilts!

  3. The Following User Says 'Aye' to kilted scholar For This Useful Post:


  4. #23
    Join Date
    9th March 13
    Location
    Croydon. UK
    Posts
    262
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you, ks. I'm commenting as an Anglican whose been reading a lot of Walter Scott, who isn't probably that reliable on details. The Church of England was probably far more Calvinistic before the 1662 Restoration than modern Anglicans like to think. By "Episcopalian" I meant the Episcopal Church of Scotland, who wouldn't have been Covenanters, surely?

    But my point is Calvinism and Jacobitism would have been typically inconsistent.

  5. #24
    Join Date
    9th March 13
    Location
    Croydon. UK
    Posts
    262
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On consideration, I should have said "Presbyterian" rather than Calvinist.

  6. The Following User Says 'Aye' to JonathanB For This Useful Post:


  7. #25
    Phil is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    13th March 07
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,407
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    CharlesII tried to impose a system of religion upon Scotland where he was the supreme head of the church controlled through an episcopacy (bishops). The Scottish covenanters believed that no-one other than Jesus Christ himself could be spiritual head of a church, not a king through his bishops.
    This was not just a whim but something thousands of Scots died for.

  8. The Following 5 Users say 'Aye' to Phil For This Useful Post:


  9. #26
    Join Date
    9th March 13
    Location
    Croydon. UK
    Posts
    262
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fair enough. But equallly, the Jacobites would have held that Jesus Christ is the only head of the church and his anointed was the divinely planned means of governing it. Thousands of Scots died or were persecuted because either they, or certainly their clan chief, held that view.

  10. #27
    Join Date
    23rd May 06
    Location
    Far NW Corner of Washington State, USA (48° 45' 51.5808" N / -122° 30' 36.6228" W)
    Posts
    5,715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Highlander present in Signing of National Covenant painting

    Did anyone else notice the token highlander seated at the signing table wearing a blue bonnet and plaid tossed over his left shoulder? He is next to the group signing the document (far left of the table):

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    Here are the pictures from Google images - this one in 1838 -
    If you follow the link below and click the picture you can see an enlarged version that more clearly shows the lone highlander:

    Quote Originally Posted by MacRobert's Reply View Post
    Here is the link to the painting of the kilted ancient in the bottom right hand corner: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpainti...s-kirkyar93072
    [SIZE="2"][FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="DarkGreen"][B][I]T. E. ("TERRY") HOLMES[/I][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]
    [SIZE="1"][FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="DarkGreen"][B][I]proud descendant of the McReynolds/MacRanalds of Ulster & Keppoch, Somerled & Robert the Bruce.[/SIZE]
    [SIZE="1"]"Ah, here comes the Bold Highlander. No @rse in his breeks but too proud to tug his forelock..." Rob Roy (1995)[/I][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]

  11. #28
    Join Date
    19th October 09
    Location
    South Queensferry, Scotland
    Posts
    616
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes indeed Terry, I did spot him but whether or not he is kilted below the waist ..... and of course the painting is of an event long past.
    It's coming yet for a' that,
    That Man to Man, the world o'er,
    Shall brothers be for a' that. - RB

  12. #29
    georgeetta is offline Registration terminated at the member's request
    Join Date
    15th September 11
    Posts
    206
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    presbyterians

    see painting battle dunkeld and church meetings in hoolw under armed guards .

    my family were Douglasses and Morrisons ..likely of Buchanans .

    I assume being nearer bog towns cities ..money flower free-er than amongst highlanders ..

    look for an armed farmer of the time ..I see a checked blanket in brown ..over shoulders .. a big tam o shanter farmers bonnet for rain ..wool outer clothes for warmth if wet ..I say buckled shoes ..no beards . scissor cropped hair ..

    maybe the jerkin style farm garment or leggings .

    farm weapons ..muskets ..swords as available ..think farmers ..

    NOT ..Guy Fawkes or Sir Walter Raleigh .

    what soldiers there had been were the young men or look outs ..

    th
    d

  13. #30
    georgeetta is offline Registration terminated at the member's request
    Join Date
    15th September 11
    Posts
    206
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    sorry a kilt is perfect for being cheapest garment ..available ..no sewing cept ..in half ..in army plaids ..

    and ..ideal for not getting chewed up by ..bracken and underbrush unlike a more expensive ..pair of breeks ..or even trews .

    and they made their bedding out of them ..never seem to see pictures of highlanders carrying backpacks ..

    or sorry, utility kilts !


    d

    look for painting of a dutch or English townsperson or farmer of the same times ..dutch seem to have painters who painted regular folks ..than rich ..clients only .

    th
    d

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0