X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 65

Thread: Rob Roy

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Mike1's Avatar
    Mike1 is offline
    Retired Forum Adminstrator
    Join Date
    23rd September 04
    Location
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Posts
    1,693
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Remember THIS ONE?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    31st May 06
    Location
    Clinton, South Carolina (USA)-> Atlanta native
    Posts
    1,787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bubba View Post
    I recall Randall Wallace, the author of Braveheart, said in an interview, " I never let the facts get in the way of the truth". My reaction to that statement was "HUH????"
    I've SEEN it said 2 ways (as I said on page 3 of thread):
    "Of course, what else would you suspect when Randal Wallace (writer of Braveheart) says "I never let the facts get in the way of a good story" (now sometimes rephrased as "way of the truth")."
    (Nice link Mike!)

    Back to topic:
    Rob Rob was MUCH better from a look/feel/personality/ stand point.
    My question is how it relates to the ACTUAL life events of Robert Roy MacGregor (Campbell).

  3. #3
    Panache's Avatar
    Panache is offline
    Retired Forum Manager
    Gentleman of X Marks

    Join Date
    24th February 06
    Location
    San Jose, California
    Posts
    9,721
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This has certainly turned into an interesting thread, Snake Eyes seems to have a talent for starting them.

    Somethings that work in a history book just don't work as a movie. So, do you not bother? Or do you make the story work as entertainment at the sacrifice of the origins of the story? I think this question is older than movies and books. It started back when people gathered around the fire and the storyteller would speak of days before. To keep the interest of the group or to teach a lesson the storyteller would slightly change the characters and events. Thus the history became altered with each telling. Eventually the history turned to a legend.

    I remember a line from an old western The Man who shot Liberty Valance .

    "This is the west, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."

    Cheers
    Last edited by Panache; 6th February 07 at 08:42 AM. Reason: spelling
    -See it there, a white plume
    Over the battle - A diamond in the ash
    Of the ultimate combustion-My panache

    Edmond Rostand

  4. #4
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Panache View Post
    This has certainly turned into an interesting thread, Snake Eyes seems to have a talent for starting them.

    Somethings that work in a history book just don't work as a movie. So, do you not bother? Or do you make the story work as entertainment at the sacrifice of the origins of the story? I think this question is older than movies and books. It started back when people gathered around the fire and the storyteller would speak of days before. To keep the interest of the group or to teach a lesson the storyteller would slightly change the characters and events. Thus the history became altered with each telling. Eventually the history turned to a legend.

    I remember a line from an old western The Man who shot Liberty Valance .

    "This is the west, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."

    Cheers
    Jamie, I use that quote every semester to start my discussion of the history of the American West and the "Frontier Thesis" of the historian Frederick Jackson Turner. Great minds think alike, eh? :mrgreen:

    T.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    9th January 07
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    449
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot View Post
    The portrayal of the Bruce in Braveheart was one of the few things I was comfortable with about the movie, because they showed him as he was; Most forget (or were unaware of) that Bruce sided with the English when it suited him, and was not the "super-nationalist" that myth portrays him today.
    I think you have hit on why I said I felt "uncomfortable" with the portrayal of the Bruce. Knowing he did side with the English when it suited him and they did bring this out in the movie, but at the same time the writers seemed to want to also perpetuate the Bruce legend as well. Its all perception I guess.

    I have to laugh at myself now because I am falling into the "trap" that I spoke against earlier. I am picking apart a MOVIE with reguards to history.
    "My hypocrisy only goes so far."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    28th April 05
    Location
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a book....either it was a history of Rob Roy or more likely it was Highland Manners and Customs (or something like that) by Sir Walter where it mentions that there was actually a (near) duel between Rob Roy and someone named Cunningham though the circumstances were different. It says that Rob Roy actually fled the field rather than fight if I remember correctly. I'll have to dig it out of the dust bins.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    28th January 07
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    385
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Panache View Post
    This has certainly turned into an interesting thread, Snake Eyes seems to have a talent for starting them.
    I really don't try to, sir

    In relation to the discussion above about Robert the Bruce, and his portrayal in Braveheart... I wonder what kind of reception he would have gotten if they'd shown him backstabbing his rival... in church! Or at least thats how the story goes.

    In all honesty, Robert the Bruce is one of my favorite characters in Braveheart, probably only second to Stephen of Ireland. The scene with this dialogue...

    Robert the Bruce: Lands, titles, men, power... nothing.
    Robert's Father: Nothing?
    Robert the Bruce: I have nothing. Men fight for me because if they do not, I throw them off my land and I starve their wives and children. Those men who bled the ground red at Falkirk fought for William Wallace. He fights for something that I never had. And I took it from him, when I betrayed him. I saw it in his face on the battlefield and it's tearing me apart.
    Robert's Father: All men betray. All lose heart.
    Robert the Bruce: I don't want to lose heart. I want to believe as he does.

    ... is seriously heartwrenching. I get teary-eyed every time I watch it.

    Wait a second, weren't we talking about Rob Roy?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    9th January 07
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    449
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wade, that was the basic meat of this thread. We were talking about how Hollywood makes a movie and how others want to tear it apart because of the liberties that they do take with history. Many just don't just see it for what it is, just a movie based on some historical character or event. Whether its Braveheart or Rob Roy or anything dealing with a historical figure, event or even revisionist history. Remember its a movie, enjoy it for what it is and that is all it is.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    13th December 06
    Location
    Bartlett, Tenn
    Posts
    1,777
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I only watch movies for entertainment. If it is well made, I can get into it. If not, well I wasted my money.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    3rd January 07
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    250
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Warhoover View Post
    Wade, that was the basic meat of this thread. We were talking about how Hollywood makes a movie and how others want to tear it apart because of the liberties that they do take with history.
    Well, I read the thread well, then didn't I? :-) I knew some of the history it was based on and contributed some points of comparison.

    I did enjoy it, BTW. Haven't seen it in a while, though.

    Wade.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0