X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 60 of 60

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Chef is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    27th October 06
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    1,526
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey@Arms View Post
    Well I think the answer is quite obvious. If you deny that a garment is a kilt, which we all agree is a garment designed for, and traditionally worn by, men, then what is the alternative? In Western society I think we all know the answer.

    Your statement that you'll defend some ones right to wear any garment they please rings hollow, if at the same time you effectively label said person a cross-dresser because their "kilt" doesn't meet your subjective criteria for what is a kilt.

    Actually I think you are reading into what I was saying. I certainly agree on your definition of a kilt, I personally however do not believe that all unbifurcated garments designed for men and worn by men are kilts. That however is not the same as calling someone a cross-dresser, whom I would define as a man dressing up as a woman. While I don't think some of the new garments being called kilts are, I don't think that means the wearer is a cross-dresser. So again it may not be my idea of a kilt, but I will defend their right to wear it. I also defend the right of someone to be a cross-dresser, I think it's odd, but they have the right.


    Quote Originally Posted by Big Mikey View Post
    For better or worse, my big mouth is in gear and ready to sound off on this topic. It would seem that all this cafuffle began with the Tripp kilt. The original thread was posted by a member who wanted to share with us his son's first purchase. This young lad has started down the road to kilt wearing and being young, he chose something that was appropriate for his age. As is true in many cases, his tastes and choices will undoubtly become more refined as he grows. All I can say is lighten up, support the boy and move on.
    Which is why I started the thread rather than post in that thread. I agree we should support him, and this thread wasn't meant to do otherwise. It was however reading that thread that got the debate started in my head and therefore gave me the idea to start this thread.
    Last edited by Chef; 8th March 07 at 11:43 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    21st June 06
    Location
    San Francisco, California or there abouts
    Posts
    2,071
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chef View Post
    Actually I think you are reading into what I was saying. I certainly agree on your definition of a kilt, I personally however do not believe that all unbifurcated garments designed for men and worn by men are kilts. That however is not the same as calling someone a cross-dresser, whom I would define as a man dressing up as a woman. While I don't think some of the new garments being called kilts are, I don't think that means the wearer is a cross-dresser. So again it may not be my idea of a kilt, but I will defend their right to wear it. I also defend the right of someone to be a cross-dresser, I think it's odd, but they have the right.
    Fair enough. Forums are an inexact means of communication. I still think my answer explains why men who personally consider the garment they are wearing to be a kilt, albeit perhaps a modern variant, are adamant that it not be categorized as something else. A kilt is a garment recognized in Western society as a man's garment. Most other unbifurcated garments are not.

    Best regards,

    Jake
    [B]Less talk, more monkey![/B]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    13th September 04
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    11,885
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't care.

    I just wear mine when I feel like it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    17th April 06
    Posts
    3,221
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Does the kilt have a future---ABSOLUTELY

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th March 06
    Location
    Ferintosh, Dumfries, Scotland
    Posts
    7,285
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ai hope kilts arr NEVER fashionable arr

    available in discoont 'trooser' shops....

    kilts in Wallymart, Gap, arr some other sweatyshop place?

    NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!





  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th September 04
    Location
    Amelia County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,562
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In my opinion, we will never see kilts in Wally World, unless they are on the rack with women's skirts. I think they will show up, sometime in the next 10 years or so, in shops which specialize in men's suits. This will probably be as a few "try on" models for special order items.
    "A day spent in the fields and woods, or on the water should not count as a day off our allotted number upon this earth."
    Jerry, Kilted Old Fart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    16th December 05
    Location
    Maryland USA
    Posts
    147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually I'm waiting for straightjackets to become
    fashionable so people stop asking why I'm in one
    and start saying how good I look. They go
    really well with a kilt.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    8th February 04
    Location
    3389 Schuylkill Rd, Spring City, PA 19475
    Posts
    5,847
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
    Actually I'm waiting for straightjackets to become
    fashionable so people stop asking why I'm in one
    and start saying how good I look. They go
    really well with a kilt.
    HAHAHAHA

  9. #9
    Join Date
    28th February 06
    Location
    Boston, Ma
    Posts
    436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got to chime in on this thread.

    As to kilts becoming popular; I can see some of the less traditional, more modern type kilts becoming more common, but popular, I don't think so. My reasoning; price, and style. Most of the younger generations who tend to push clothing trends aren't afraid to spend money on clothing, but probably won't want to spend the kind of money it costs to buy a tank. Most of these people would also perfer to not look retro, but would rather move forward, and try to incorporate the look into where todays fashion is going. Of course I am not very fashionable myself, so this is just speculation.

    I think the most important thing is to look, and act appropriate in whatever kilt variant you choose to wear. How we put our outfits together is important, as it sends a message to whoever sees us wearing our kilts. The kilt outfit you wear changing your oil may not be the best choice of kilt outfit to wear to a wedding. Nor would the kilt outfit you wear at a wedding be the most appropriate choice for spending a day at the mall with your wife. Some kilts were designed for casual use, while others were designed to be worn formaly. Others still fall comfortably (and thankfully) in the middle. Put together the right combination, and adopt the correct behavior for the situation, and kilt wearing will be advanced.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    10th April 05
    Location
    Woodbury, MN
    Posts
    405
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    OK, now that my comment has been quoted several times, I think i should clarify: My sarcasm was somewhat directed at the future of this website.

    First, I personally think that the whole Tripp kilt thingy is overblown. As far as I am concerned, it looks close enough to a kilt to qualify and we should encourage people to wear kilts and support them when they do.

    Now, to the meat of my issue. If this a kilted website, it is my opinion that there should be some sort of standard as to what constitutes a kilt-like garment. Otherwise, we will indeed become just another MUG site like others we have all seen on the web. I have seen the moderators on this site comment about certain topics being not kilt related and more suited for the off topic section and so on. I cant remember a specific example...sorry. Anyway, I dont know if there are standards that can be applied, but nor do i want to see lots of discussions on sarongs or skirts. I know there's a line in here somewhere, but i cant articulate it well right now.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Similar Threads

  1. Hope for the Future
    By Vince in forum General Kilt Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 26th September 06, 08:26 PM
  2. Scotland in my future?
    By Randy in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11th March 06, 04:05 PM
  3. My future jacket - help!
    By Prester John in forum General Kilt Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10th December 05, 10:33 PM
  4. Alas, no PK in the immediate future
    By David Thornton in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 6th November 05, 02:43 PM
  5. The Future of Kilts?
    By Gary in forum Kilts in the Media
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26th August 05, 03:37 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0