|
-
19th October 09, 08:35 AM
#1
I hope Jamie had fun hitting the tubes and running off the kooks. Locals only!!!
Jay
Clan Rose - Constant and True
"I cut a stout blackthorn to banish ghosts and goblins; In a brand new pair of brogues to ramble o'er the bogs and frighten all the dogs " - D. K. Gavan
-
-
21st October 09, 05:07 AM
#2
An image of a man in a wetsuit with a kilt comes to mind. >:-) That would plaster the internet! Get the wetsuit. That's a good price for one and you may not be able to get one next time they go on sale.
-
-
21st October 09, 05:10 AM
#3
I should have read the other posts before posting. What a dummie I am.
-
-
28th October 09, 05:58 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by Dirka Skene
I should have read the other posts before posting. What a dummie I am.
No not you unless you're strapping on a rubber suit and imitating a seal in shark infested waters. Brave man though it took me 20 years to go swimming in the Great Lakes for fear of shark attacks. Promblem is there 'aint no sharks in fresh water! I'm blame Spielberg .
-
-
27th October 09, 08:17 PM
#5
A new hobby!
You're all set, except for gas bills, though. You can't spend a mint on boogie boarding, though if you get the urge to stand up, oooohhhh, yeah. Custom boards? major cash outlay.
-
-
28th October 09, 10:06 PM
#6
Actually, Bull Sharks have been known to frequent fresh water in some areas of the world.
By Choice, not by Birth
-
-
29th October 09, 07:19 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by Bigkahuna
Actually, Bull Sharks have been known to frequent fresh water in some areas of the world.
Ah but the most dangerous thing in the great Lakes are the Zebra Muscles, viscious little blighters just sit there and clog water intakes.
Was it not the Bull shark responsible for the New Jersey shark attacks in 1916?
-
-
30th October 09, 06:34 AM
#8
 Originally Posted by ccga3359
Ah but the most dangerous thing in the great Lakes are the Zebra Muscles, viscious little blighters just sit there and clog water intakes.
Was it not the Bull shark responsible for the New Jersey shark attacks in 1916?
The book "Close to Shore" suggests that they were all from the same Great White.
It would seem to me more likely that there were (at least) two different sharks involved and the attacks up river were a bull shark while the ones on the coast could have been either species.
Cheers
Jamie :ootd:
-See it there, a white plume
Over the battle - A diamond in the ash
Of the ultimate combustion-My panache
Edmond Rostand
-
-
30th October 09, 05:54 PM
#9
 Originally Posted by Panache
The book "Close to Shore" suggests that they were all from the same Great White.
It would seem to me more likely that there were (at least) two different sharks involved and the attacks up river were a bull shark while the ones on the coast could have been either species.
Cheers
Jamie :ootd:
I would think that quite a coinsidence that two rogue sharks of different species attacking in such a short space of time.
Anyhow play safe - wear a neoprene kilt when you hang twelve.
-
-
31st October 09, 06:45 PM
#10
Nobody was hacking the fins off of sharks back then so more of them were around. People were becoming more water sports oriented then as well, which gave sharks more opportunities.
By Choice, not by Birth
-
Similar Threads
-
By Alan H in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 14
Last Post: 12th August 09, 08:27 AM
-
By Riverkilt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 28
Last Post: 14th November 08, 07:06 PM
-
By Arlen in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 18
Last Post: 9th August 07, 11:21 AM
-
By Alan H in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 14
Last Post: 10th March 07, 12:42 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks