-
29th March 06, 05:09 AM
#1
things just keep changing
Just saw this on the BBC site.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4854294.stm
Can't imagine my kid not getting to shoot one of these fun little guns!
macG
-
-
29th March 06, 09:45 AM
#2
Well, I'm going to treat my '73 even better than ever now.
Jack
-
-
29th March 06, 09:55 AM
#3
That's too bad. Those are really good guns.
-
-
29th March 06, 10:26 AM
#4
Things like this blow my mind because when you think of some of the crap that has seen its production stepped up it's a tragedy to see something so quintessential fall by the wayside.
Best
AA
-
-
29th March 06, 11:09 AM
#5
Always been a Marlin man myself, but I wish I could've afforded this one. At $1,474.95 when it came on the market, there was no way I could've gotten one, and now, there's no chance I'll ever be able to.
-
-
29th March 06, 11:12 AM
#6
Yeah, it's a shame. If I were a gun collector, I would definitely want one of these in the collection.
I can't blame the company though. They have to do what's good for the company, and if the rifle is not profitable it has to go.
We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb
-
-
29th March 06, 02:05 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by Iolaus
Always been a Marlin man myself, but I wish I could've afforded this one. At $1,474.95 when it came on the market, there was no way I could've gotten one, and now, there's no chance I'll ever be able to.
Yup, Marlin for me also, I always liked a scope and a Winchester sucked when it came to mounting a scope on it, always jamming. I had a Glenfield model with matching scope but my son wanted it more so guess where it is these days? It's going to be a serious problem for him since he has three sons himself and they're all going to want it!
Chris. :confused:
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|