Kilted in the 1800's

[Drac]

Good evening all,

I recently got my wife a membership to the Jane Austen Society of North America for Christmas. As mentioned before it is one of her favorite authors.

From what I can see part of which includes period garb events. From my pitiful knowledge I believe this would be George III era. This would fall after the romantic revival but before the height of the Victorian era.

From what little I can find kilts would be appropriate, PC, but most of the pics I find are Victorian and quite frankly I've got to wonder how they walked around.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jim

[dutchy kilted]

Check for pics and links under "regency" or "empire" era. That would be the correct period of clothing.

Sir Walter Scott romanticized the kilt in the early 18th century, so you have some historical basis.

[Dale Seago]

Some thoughts here:

http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/f...-attire-59996/

[Drac]

Some thoughts here:

http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/f...-attire-59996/

Thanks. I checked it out but while I could do a jabot but the jacket is way beyond my skill and probably beyond my wife's even if we had a pattern.


So I would have to have a different kilt, hmm. Don't see that working well.

"Amy, you know that Jane Austen membership I got you?"

"Yes."

"Well they have events where we can got in garb."

"Cool."

"Well I will have to have a new kilt, jacket, buckle shoes, ..."



Jim

[artificer]

So I would have to have a different kilt, hmm. Don't see that working well.

"Amy, you know that Jane Austen membership I got you?"

"Yes."

"Well they have events where we can got in garb."

"Cool."

"Well I will have to have a new kilt, jacket, buckle shoes, ..."



Jim

It's the gift that BOTH of you can enjoy!

[MacMillan of Rathdown]

Jane Austen was/is very much a fixture of Regency England. As such it would have been neigh on impossible that a gentleman in England during that time would have worn a kilt. Proper attire for the period would be that of the upper-middle class and upper-class English gentleman.

Had you bought your wife a membership in the Sir Walter Scott Society of North America instead, you could have probably justified another kilt...

[figheadair]

I recently got my wife a membership to the Jane Austen Society of North America for Christmas. As mentioned before it is one of her favorite authors.

From what I can see part of which includes period garb events. From my pitiful knowledge I believe this would be George III era. This would fall after the romantic revival but before the height of the Victorian era.

The late 18th and early 19th centuries were period of great variation and change in the development of Highland Dress. Jane Austen (1775-1817) lived through much of the reign of Geo III (1760-1820) and the Regency (1811-1820). Both these periods, and the later reigns of Geo IV (1820-30) and William IV (1830-37) encompass what is termed the Highland Revival era.

Sir Walter Scott romanticized the kilt in the early 18th century, so you have some historical basis.

Early 1800s = early 19th century.

Jane Austen was/is very much a fixture of Regency England. As such it would have been neigh on impossible that a gentleman in England during that time would have worn a kilt. Proper attire for the period would be that of the upper-middle class and upper-class English gentleman.

It's not quite that simple. Several of the Chiefs, MacDonell of Glengarry being a leading force, were active at Court during the Regency and there is evidence that they, and the Prince Regent, wore Highland Clothes at some Balls and other events.

Most of the surviving outfits ones sees are Regency and later and it's rare to find examples of civilian Highland dress pre-c1815. The main difference is in the style and cut of the jacket. I have been working with some outfits of the period but am not yet able to post images but hope to be able to publish them next year.

There are a good number of surviving Regency era kilts that can be used as a template. Both Bob Martin and Matt Newsome have written on the styles and construction of box pleated kilts of the erly 1800s.

[OC Richard]

Jane Austen was/is very much a fixture of Regency England. As such it would have been neigh on impossible that a gentleman in England during that time would have worn a kilt.

An exception that comes to mind is an officer in a Highland regiment who might well attend a ball or other function in his regiment's full dress uniform.

As mentioned above, the period in question, spanning the end of the 18th century and the first quarter of the 19th, was a time of rapid change in men's fashion, which had a "trickle down effect" on Highland Dress.

To illustrate, late 18th century Highland officer's dress looked like this:



Around 1900 jacket collars began to get higher and the front opening of men's coats changed. (Both civilian and military, the two usually evolving more or less together.)
18th century coats were double-breasted with the lapels being buttoned back. Around 1900 the lapels began to be closed and buttoned and the coatee evolved. The skirts of the 18th century jacket got shoved more to the rear and shortened.

Here's a clan chief at the start of the 19th century showing the change in jacket style already underway



and another portrait of around the same time. Note the double-breasted coatee buttoned across the chest, the higher collar, the tails moved around to the back and side.



A bit later than the period under discussion perhaps, but interesting, are these surviving costumes from 1822. First we see the evolution to a single-breasted jacket with only lines of trim suggesting the earlier buttoned-back lapels



and here no suggestion of the coatee's double-breasted origin remains. The tails in the rear can be seen.




and from 1835, retaining the double-breasted look of the early 19th century. Here can see seen how sporrans usually looked in the first quarter of the 19th century, a narrow rim of binding instead of a cantle at the top, a fringe of hair in a contrasting colour at the top, and a row of large tassels.

[MacMillan of Rathdown]

An exception that comes to mind is an officer in a Highland regiment who might well attend a ball or other function in his regiment's full dress uniform.

True, but only in Scotland. It's my understanding that between the end of the American War and the beginning of the Napoleonic war (when Jane Austen flourished), no Scottish regiment was stationed in England. Any officer of a Highland regiment, traveling in England, would have been dressed in ordinary civilian attire and, in all likelihood, would have likewise been thus attired if attending a civilian ball.

I think the best approach to this (attending a Jane Austen Society Ball) is to adopt the attitude that if it isn't mentioned in a Jane Austen novel, it doesn't exist.

[Drac]

I think the best approach to this (attending a Jane Austen Society Ball) is to adopt the attitude that if it isn't mentioned in a Jane Austen novel, it doesn't exist.

I was going to go to one and get a feel for it anyways.

Hopefully they'll be relax enough for me to bend the rules a little. Like I said I will get an English garb eventually.

As for Mr. Darcey, she already has the "I love Mr Darcey" tee I got her a couple years ago. Though since this year's conferance (in our area, how cool) is on Sense and Sensibility would be Edward I guess.

Curious about the D'Arcy, I looked up the spelling and my copy (yes I carry the complete works of Jane Auten in my E-Readr) and it has Darcey. Is there a differance I should know about before I get into trouble?

Jim