X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    16th May 08
    Location
    forgotten
    Posts
    923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At least with tartan drawers if you flashed anyone it would not be clear if you were regimental or they just got the sight of the kilt.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    11th March 06
    Location
    Near Birmingham U.K.
    Posts
    676
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The braces/suspenders issue is confusing me too. I think all men wore them at that time, but on your underpants???!!!!!
    The Kilt is my delight !

  3. #3
    Join Date
    17th January 09
    Location
    The Highlands of Norfolk, England
    Posts
    7,015
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We are making some assumptions that might not hold true.

    The Duke of Windsor's underwear used to button into his trousers. He put the two on together and regardless of how strenuous the exercise he undertook, his underpants would never ride up.

    It might very well be possible that the same goes for these kilt drawers. It was also quite standard at one time for men to tuck their T shirts or singlets into their underpants.

    It wasn't that long ago when most clothing was individually tailored, so it is possible that these drawers were made to fit a particular set of braces (suspenders).

    As it is the waist sizes are quite different, so I don't think that they originally went together.

    Regards

    Chas

  4. #4
    Join Date
    10th June 10
    Location
    Western Washington State or s/v Lady Washington
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by freddie View Post
    The braces/suspenders issue is confusing me too. I think all men wore them at that time, but on your underpants???!!!!!
    Pardon me for a minute, comparing this to saxon wear. Historically underdrawers with trousers had loops or holes to catch into the braces/suspenders and thereby hold them up along with the trousers. The shirt remember was knee lenght and considered underwear. It would be tucked up between the legs and held there by the trousers. Obviously the shirt had to go under the underdrawers. Oftimes habits continue long after the reason for them is moot. Sorry if this is revealing too much.
    Elf

    There is no bad weather; only inappropriate clothing.
    -atr: New Zealand proverb

  5. #5
    Join Date
    28th June 11
    Location
    Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    1,246
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Personally, I find it quite bizare myself, but maybe the gent cycled in his kilt and didn't want to offend?
    Martin.
    AKA - The Scouter in a Kilt.
    Proud, but homesick, son of Skye.
    Member of the Clan MacLeod Society (Scotland)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th October 09
    Location
    Kerrville, Texas
    Posts
    5,711
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I find it odd that some people claim these were "common", yet no one can explain how they work or how they're worn!

    And when I try to work it out in my own head, I can't help but think it's like a tartan version of this:




  7. #7
    Join Date
    18th July 07
    Location
    North East Scotland
    Posts
    1,027
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tartan undertrews were not just common, they were almost universal, two pairs being automatically supplied by kiltmakers prior to the Second War. Of course, they were not comfortable but people didn't expect clothing to be all that comfortable in those days. They originated in the army.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    25th November 11
    Location
    upstate NY near Syracuse are
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i might even think the trews under the kilt was a very common thing even in the early days of the kilt. many of the descriptions giving of the 16th century scots do mention trews and there long cloak witch could be neatly tucked up in belt for travel. or simply says the simplest of covering for there lower then goes on to describe shirt and cloak/brat/kilt.
    for a while i have thought that going regimental was a rather new thing.
    but im sure there is better historians here who can say more.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    27th October 09
    Location
    Kerrville, Texas
    Posts
    5,711
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by neloon View Post
    Tartan undertrews were not just common, they were almost universal, two pairs being automatically supplied by kiltmakers prior to the Second War. Of course, they were not comfortable but people didn't expect clothing to be all that comfortable in those days. They originated in the army.
    I thought the army required the kilt to be worn 'regimental' style? I guess I don't understand how tartan undergarments would have originated in the army if they weren't allowed to be worn. Or is the whole military 'regimental' requirement just a myth?

    I could see them being used for formal affairs like military balls where ladies might be present, though, so that could explain it...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    17th December 07
    Location
    Staunton, Va
    Posts
    4,948
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tobus View Post
    I find it odd that some people claim these were "common", yet no one can explain how they work or how they're worn!

    And when I try to work it out in my own head, I can't help but think it's like a tartan version of this:



    As a youngster my "wee trews" were held up with a pair of narrow white braces that were worn over my t-shirt and under my dress shirt. This provided a bit of bulk around my hips and helped keep my kilt cinched in place. My younger cousin had bodice that buttoned up the front attached to his wee trews; this was worn under his shirt instead of a t-shirt. When my Mother's uncle passed away I had to sort through his things, amongst which was a kilt in McBain tartan with matching trews lined with chamois to guard against chaffing.

    I suspect "wee trews" are a mystery to most North Americans of Scottish ancestry because they have come to kilt wearing rather recently-- since the 1960s at any rate-- and their local kilt shops probably didn't bother to supply their customers with any sort of tartan underpinnings.
    [SIZE=1]and at EH6 7HW[/SIZE]

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0