X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
  1. #11
    Join Date
    27th October 09
    Location
    Kerrville, Texas
    Posts
    5,711
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mookien View Post
    I own "8-yard" kilts in medium-weight (~ 13 oz.) and in heavy-weight (~15 - 16 oz.) tartan. The latter are noticeably heavier - "light tanks" vs. "heavy tanks".
    Good point about the fabric weight. When the term "tank" was coined on this forum, I believe it only referred to a ~15-16 oz. wool tartan. Anything lighter than that would not be a tank, regardless of the yardage. At best, it would be a light armored kilt. IMHO, a "tank" must be 15-16 oz., and a "heavy tank" would be 18-20 oz. material.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    22nd December 10
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Forgive me if I am missing something, but a traditionally made kilt does not have to be a tank. More to the point, Traditional does not equal tank--yet tank does imply traditional. Just my understanding, but I stand by to be corrected.
    Last edited by Spartan Tartan; 9th September 13 at 04:47 PM.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    14th October 10
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM, USA
    Posts
    3,325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't help too much here, except to point out that a "TANK" is defined in part as "traditional" for purposes of the XMTS forum at web page

    http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/f...q#faq_faq_abbr

    under the heading, "X Marks Specific Acronyms & Kilt terms"

    Note also that under this definition a "TANK" does not have to be made from heavy-weight wool. Ain't semantics fun!
    I changed my signature. The old one was too ridiculous.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    14th January 08
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    4,143
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My first kilt in Forrester Modern is only 13 oz Strathmore tartan but because of the combination of my measurements and the giant sett size my clan tartan has the kiltmaker actually used closer to 10 yards of material, so in it actually is similar in overall weight and in a couple instances heavier than my other classic 8 yard tanks which are nearly all 16oz material. And it wears every bit as hard as the heavyweights. so yes you can make a tank out of lighter weight tartan.
    Last edited by ForresterModern; 9th September 13 at 06:48 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    6th September 12
    Location
    Coeymans Hollow, NY
    Posts
    942
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So what yer sayin here John, is if I pull this trigger, go for the heavy tank? Will it help my bad back?

    This money is hard to come by. I just want to do my best to make the right decision.

    Thanks!

    Frank
    Ne Obliviscaris

  6. #16
    Join Date
    14th October 10
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM, USA
    Posts
    3,325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Jeff: Good to hear from you, again. I hope things are going well.

    The tartan in one of my 8-yard, medium-weight kilts (Strathtummel) was also woven by Strathmore. It's heavy enough for me. Your 10-yard kilt probably does weigh about as much as my 8-yard heavy weights.

    By the way, I have been meaning to tell you that you were right about Aberlour A'Bunadh. I like it even better than their 12- and 16-year old distillations. While it is cask strength, so that I put a little H2O in it, it still has the best flavor and finish of any sherry-finished malt that I have tasted, including the excellent Macallan 15 cask strength. Thanks, ... and slainte mhath!

    John
    I changed my signature. The old one was too ridiculous.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    25th November 09
    Location
    Lomita, CA (via Boston, MA)
    Posts
    1,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    My Situation Is Similiar

    Quote Originally Posted by frank_a View Post
    So what yer sayin here John, is if I pull this trigger, go for the heavy tank? Will it help my bad back?

    This money is hard to come by. I just want to do my best to make the right decision.

    Thanks!

    Frank
    Just to avoid confusion FOUR YARD does not mean casual. Do a search here and you will find plenty of info on box pleated kilts which are every bit traditional. In fact they pre dated knife pleats. I purchased my first box pleat because funds were tight, and now have a few and really like them. There are a couple of very traditional kilt makers on this board who sew 4 yard box pleat kilts and they are grand. Don't think you have to have an 8 yard kilt for appearances sake.

  8. The Following 5 Users say 'Aye' to seanachie For This Useful Post:


  9. #18
    Join Date
    14th October 10
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM, USA
    Posts
    3,325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by frank_a View Post
    So what yer sayin here John, is if I pull this trigger, go for the heavy tank? Will it help my bad back?

    This money is hard to come by. I just want to do my best to make the right decision. ...
    Frank: If carrying a heavy-weight kilt on your hips is going to aggravate your back in any way, I would strongly suggest getting a lower-yardage wool kilt in medium or heavy weight. See seanachie's post (#17). I have 4-, 5-, and 6-yard wool kilts and they look/feel great. I would bet good money that nobody, except perhaps a kilt expert, could tell the difference without a closer examination.

    On the other hand, if you are bound and determined to have an indisputable "tank" and the heavier weight won't bother you physically, then I suggest saving your coin and springing for a heavy-weight (at least 15 oz) tartan in an 8-yard kilt in your "most favorite" tartan. They have a certain look, feel, and swing that is hard to beat, especially to the wearer.

    John
    I changed my signature. The old one was too ridiculous.

  10. The Following User Says 'Aye' to mookien For This Useful Post:


  11. #19
    Join Date
    3rd January 06
    Location
    Dorset, on the South coast of England
    Posts
    4,521
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you get an 8 yard kilt in 16 oz material, that is going to be about 4Lb of tartan, lining, reinforcement, straps and buckles in total.

    Whilst the higher waist and reinforcement might act as a support and help your back there is no guarantee of that.

    A 4 yard box pleated kilt in heavy tartan might be a safer introduction to kilting, and it is no less traditional - some might say it is more the archetypal kilt than the 8yard knife pleat.

    Anne the Pleater :ootd:

  12. #20
    Join Date
    6th September 12
    Location
    Coeymans Hollow, NY
    Posts
    942
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's the thing folks. First of all, thanks for the weight figure Anne. I just don't think 4#s to be a problem. Secondly, my interest is in a kilt with more pleats than less. When I was at the Kirkin Saturday, the pipers were all in the same tartan, but one had many more narrower pleats in the back, and just looked smashing. Can I assume that was probably more an 8 yard kilt vs. a 4 or 5 yard kilt?

    I think I can travel when I'm ready to pull the trigger and have a talk with the kilt maker. I will figure this out. Heavens knows, I have time to think!

    Frank
    Ne Obliviscaris

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0