X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
13th May 14, 06:11 AM
#36
 Originally Posted by MacCorquodale
Well, that is all fine and I'm open to the possibility, but I'd still like to see some hard proof why we should throw Mr. Smith's research out the window first.
Something better than anecdotal accounts of "first hand knowledge" and my father called it "tartans for everyone."
Perhaps Peter could fill us in on something a bit more in the way of evidence that Mr. Smith's research is bunk.
Using phone records doesn't strike me as any less valid than any other type of record as a research tool. I mean, are census records also not to be used to try to trace back?
I highly doubt that someone as well known and with such acclaim and awards as well as degrees is such a sloppy historian as to just see who lives there now to proclaim who belongs to a clan. That dog just doesn't hunt.
Sorry if I'm ruffling feathers here but it just doesn't make sense.
Without going through TFM that's difficult but we've been here before - see post #6 and others http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/f...ability-66309/
Last edited by figheadair; 13th May 14 at 10:20 AM.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to figheadair For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks