MacDonald of Clanranald (1914)

[Domehead]

Hey Ryan,

Can you provide more details about what this means exactly?

Cheers,

N

Nathan,
Initially, let me apologize for my considerable delay. I simply didn't realize you'd asked.

Part I

Based on my formal education and practical application there of, Deconstructive Literary Criticism is premised on two fundamental things:
A. The text only
B. The repetitive idea which illuminates itself throughout that text, called Trace

A. & B. will exist out with the author, meaning the following...
Prose of all forms & Poetry of all styles are wrought of two things:
1. Subjectivity
2. Edit

The reader can only interpret what has been presented to them, and they bring with them the very same subjectivity & edit.
So, it is incumbent upon the reader to discipline themselves to remain as "objective" as possible. Here is an example which has stuck with me for many years...

One can find many educated, well constructed, highly sourced - both critically & psychoanalytically - essays re: the autobiographic nature of Shakespeare's Hamlet.
They center around the character Hamlet: his gender, neuroses, depression, border-line socio-pathology and are subsequently equated with William Shakespeare's biological son named Hamnet, whom suffered from many of the same maladies.

However, lest any reader over any period of time was at the desk while Bill's iambic-pentameter got penned, no-one knows exactly what was the motivation.
As well, one cannot arbitrarily render "Critical Analysis of Shakespeare" from one century as "better than" that of another.
So the deconstructionist attempts to react to "facts" as they are revealed in the text alone...free from subjective contextual information.
If those subjective contextual influences are, in fact, significant - their impact will be revealed throughout the text, repeated over & over & over again as Trace.

Part II

How this relates to Tartanology?

For me, the "text" is:
The entire 19th century canon (The 1819 KPB to H. Whyte & W.&A.K. Johnston's Library Edition (1892-1906).
All the Pattern Books & Ledgers (Scot Adie, J. Claude Friese, William Wilson 3 & 4, HSL through to STS)
All Tartanology Experts (P.E. MacDonald incl. his essays, M.A.C. Newsome, J.D. Scarlett, J.C. Thomson, William & Donald Stewart, et al)
Tartanologically influential works (Frank Adam, James Logan, Martin Martin, Dr. Phillip D. Smith, Roddy Martine, Romily Squire & Gordon Teale, etc.)
Period Pieces & Historic References (Lord John Murray, 4th Duke of Athole's Diary of the Royal Levee, 1822; the Rev.'s Angus & Archibald MacDonald's The Clan Donald, etc.)

The "Trace" are repeated, factually corroborated evidences contained there-in which, through shear preponderance, forms logical & sourced judgments about Authenticity or Credibility of setts. One must recognize, from a deconstructive perspective, we are only peeling back layers to an obfuscated onion which in-turn reveals new "Trace".

As an example, I have been working and re-working, as objectively as I can, a detailed thesis re: the Robertson of Struan 1816.
I completely analyze, cite & source the following:
a. The two sett variants
b. The colourway
c. The sett construction and its relation to the MacDonald Motif
d. The sociological phenomenon nurture, relocation and "groupishness"
e. The Scots Law re: Surname of Place
f. A linguistic explanation of Compound Plural nouns & its relation to Self-style versus Peerage
g. Early Donnachaidh origins from Somerled to Angus Mor to "Duncan" of the mainland
h. The various MacDonald allies whom bear tartan with conspicuous MacDonald motif per P.E. MacDonald's theory on regionality in design
I. Those same allies association with various Stewarts and their association with Atholl and Donnachaidh.

All this, in an attempt to logically & analytically explain why:
This sett was submitted to the Highland Society of London, 1816 tagged "Robertson of Struan"; a Robertson re-colouring of the Kingsbury sett; yet with a green / blue ground & scarlet over-stripes.

I am just about finished, as I've discovered some new information which I feel obligated to address.
That being said, I'm comfortable with not only with criticism of my work, but hopefully any subsequent analysis which comes from the paper.
After all, If I've done my job, there is a "Trace" to be followed & analyzed which will pulverize my effort, but lead to more truth.