-
8th September 14, 04:39 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by Nathan
I not a fan of either if that helps.
Honestly though, I think the pith helmet is an idiosyncratic choice but it was worn by kilted regiments. The pseudo jacobite shirt is the product of Hollywood imagination. It leads people to incorrectly deduce that the kilt was worn this way in a bygone era. Just my thoughts.
You just cut to the heart of the issue for me: the pith helmet was a part of a military uniform in previous generations, but not civilian dress. Why is one ahistorical affectation bad and the other not?
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to BadenochWolf For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|