Originally Posted by
Father Bill
So where is the kindness, thoughtfulness, and generosity in this situation... on either side?
Wasn't going to mention that, but for a Christian do, the Christian element seems to be sadly lacking. From the wording of the original article it would seem that the lad had no idea that his kilt might not be acceptable and if, as it says he has, he has worn it on many other occasions, presumably locally, then I see no reason why he should. However it is the suggestion that he wears it with trousers which is the real killer. It is either based on ignorance or B mindedness and neither is excusable in the eyes of the law. In my school days it would have been the haircut that got him thrown out. 
If you are going to do it, do it in a kilt!
Bookmarks