I agree Steve, this kilt has loops sized for that narrower belt and not much else. I'm thinking it's a very early version of the little kilt.
slàinte mhath, Chuck
Originally Posted by MeghanWalker,In answer to Goodgirlgoneplaids challenge:
"My sporran is bigger and hairier than your sporran"
Pants is only a present tense verb here. I once panted, but it's all cool now.
Having never worn the kilt with that sort of fastening I do wonder if that fastening was easier to operate when the owner was "in the line"? I am wondering if the owner, perhaps with advice from the tailor, took a conscious decision to have that style of fastening for practical reasons? Who knows?
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
Victoria, BC Canada 48° 25' 47.31"N 123° 20' 4.59" W
Posts
4,360
Mentioned
18 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
The curator of the Canadian Scottish Regimental Museum was just in my shop checking on the progress of some rosettes we are making for a kilt in the museum.
We got to talking about the kilts in the museum and this thread.
According to him, most but not all, of the MacKenzie/Seaforth kilts they have are fastened like this.
We then were trying to determine where the kilts were made. I'll keep you posted when we figure it out.
Steve Ashton
Forum Owner
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Steve Ashton For This Useful Post:
Bookmarks