It seems to me that all the reasons put forth so far as to 'why a woman should not wear a kilt', the crux of most of which seems to be "because it's for men", have been used before to explain the following:

'why a woman should not wear pants'
'why a woman should not join a certain club'
'why a woman should not play cards'

While I think we'd all agree that the reason "because it's for men" is no longer good enough for the above examples (I hope), I suppose it still carries some weight when used in some explanations. I guess different cultures value the reason "because it's for men" differently.

I'd go further to say that the argument has probably been made throughout history that men should not wear un-bifurcated garments "because they're for women". I really can't see that argument as any different than "because it's for men".

Craig