X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
31st March 07, 07:52 PM
#1
<<<Quote:
Originally Posted by gilmore
Sorry to disappoint you, but there just aren't any reliable genealogical records for anyone much earlier than a few generations before Charlemagne, around 800 AD, and those are only of the royaly and aristocracy of course. Virtually everything prior to that is legend, myth and conjecture. As are quite a few genealogies after that time.
thats how i found my lines royal records got lucky.>>>
Let me be clear: even the royal lines prior to a few generations before Charlemagne are legend, myth or conjecture. In other words we know to a reasonable degree of certainty who Charlemagne's immediate ancestors were. We do not, however, know who were the ancestors of those people. They cannot be reliably connected to anyone earlier. From time to time various people have made up all sorts of fanciful stories about descendancy for them from Adam, various Norse, Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, etc, but they simply are not creditable, i.e., the stories fall apart under scrutiny. There are no valid, reliable genealogies going back earlier than the 700's AD.
Last edited by gilmore; 31st March 07 at 11:38 PM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Mr. Kilt in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 13
Last Post: 31st January 07, 08:04 AM
-
By souzaphone711 in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 29
Last Post: 19th December 06, 01:24 PM
-
By Big Dave in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 13
Last Post: 9th April 06, 11:23 AM
-
By Derek in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 8
Last Post: 27th November 05, 09:04 PM
-
By Canuck in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 11
Last Post: 4th August 04, 03:14 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks