Quote Originally Posted by sjrapid View Post
Is it about being King of the Mountain?. I'm deeply envious if you have both two decent kiltmakers on your highstreet, and the financial wherewithal to go at that rate, however you measure it!
'Twas simply an extreme example to illustrate my point. Nothing more.

Quote Originally Posted by sjrapid View Post
Ah! I think I detect a note of competition here! With kilts you can count on one hand, I humbly yield to those with deeper addictions.
For me this is not a race. I'm just geek enough to think about stuff like this and get a small amount of enjoyment from it.

Quote Originally Posted by sjrapid View Post
I like this idea as a set of modifications to the unit, but if you're going to weight for time, I wonder if you'd need to adjust for the total duration of ownership for each kilt not for the bulk. That would further enhance Hamish's glory, and diminish the newbies by comparison. Perhaps you'd like to propose a revision to the draft standard?

Best regards
Too much work to do it for each kilt. Might be interesting to do but still too much work. Were we all geeks, wholly dyed in the wool, it would be a no-brainer; but, since we're not, I suspect that keeping the rating math simple is the more universally acceptable policy.

I had thought that my post was a proposed revision to the draft standard. Splash_4 has already done the prototype implementation so it would seem that the draft is well on its way to adoption.