X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
12th June 07, 02:22 PM
#10
I guess what I'm trying to say is that anything other than a clan tartan is not the "real" thing either. Correct we if I'm wrong. So why not revere the tradition of tartans being associated with clans? Why not go all the way and do it "right" according to a 150 year old tradition? I'm not trying to ruffle feathers, I believe that know one can tell you what you can and can't do, but if something is tied close to a culture like the kilt is. It should be respected. So I think there is a line between a kilt and a kilt like garment. And......that brings up another topic. Which always comes up, What's that line? A non-clan associated tartan kilt, a fashion tartan kilt, solid color kilts? No matter what it was before, if it is the accepted tradition of the current times it should be respected.
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks