-
16th July 07, 11:40 PM
#11
Thank you sir for the link.
I have printed a copy and plan to attach it to the outer door to my office tomorrow. Alas, I still await a decision from management despite thorough documentation of the benefits of wearing kilts in multiple areas.
Perhaps this will help drive the history home.
Ron
Ol' Macdonald himself, a proud son of Skye and Cape Breton Island
Lifetime Member STA. Two time winner of Utilikiltarian of the Month.
"I'll have a kilt please, a nice hand sewn tartan, 16 ounce Strome. Oh, and a sporran on the side, with a strap please."
-
-
17th July 07, 12:42 PM
#12
Originally Posted by Riverkilt
I have printed a copy and plan to attach it to the outer door to my office tomorrow.
Ron
You're a scoundrel Ron, you know you are!
-
-
17th July 07, 01:19 PM
#13
Originally Posted by emolas
Very interesting, I wonder how many people were sent off to plantations for 7 years for violating this.
I took a quick look through my books to find an actual number. They tend to refer to large numbers without specifying an amount.
Try to keep a historical perspective. Transport to the colonies was not like a penal transport. It was closer to a death sentence. In crude terms, slavery was an investment, people protect their investments. Those sent to the colonies were sold into service which was a cost. There were certain conditions to be met on termination, if the person survived. There were many factors that caused the sentence to be extended. Few of these people survived. The only real way out was escape and mingling with the colonists, which evolved into slavery along race lines.
To grasp an idea of the magnitude of this event in world history, look to the number of places in the colonies named for Cumberland, or William, or Sweet William. All these are in homage to the leader who stopped the Scots.
-
-
17th July 07, 02:57 PM
#14
Originally Posted by Archangel
I took a quick look through my books to find an actual number. They tend to refer to large numbers without specifying an amount.
Try to keep a historical perspective. Transport to the colonies was not like a penal transport. It was closer to a death sentence. In crude terms, slavery was an investment, people protect their investments. Those sent to the colonies were sold into service which was a cost. There were certain conditions to be met on termination, if the person survived. There were many factors that caused the sentence to be extended. Few of these people survived. The only real way out was escape and mingling with the colonists, which evolved into slavery along race lines.
To grasp an idea of the magnitude of this event in world history, look to the number of places in the colonies named for Cumberland, or William, or Sweet William. All these are in homage to the leader who stopped the Scots.
This topic has come up a number of times here and in conversations I've had with others, but I admit I'm ignorant of the details . . . can anyone recommend some good books? Thanks!
-
-
17th July 07, 04:23 PM
#15
I'm still looking in my books for more info but can't find any solid info. I have note from university history courses but they're in the box. What I did find was that the immigration in the mid 1700 was about 20% Scots. They were generally unwelcome and didn't make good servants, go figure.
Once England has more control, later in the century, the numbers are more specific but that's not the period you're asking about.
One of the things that Scotland did not want was anybody checking the ships that came or went. This is one of the economic reasons for the wars. Scotland made significant money through ships avoiding British tariffs. One of the results of the war was the ability to impose heavier tariffs for all shipping. This, of course, lead to the American War of Independence, or Revolutionary War, depending on your perspective.
The basic tartan books give good information but they're not authoritative. Let's see what other's come up with.
-
-
18th July 07, 10:42 AM
#16
It is worrying to think a clan museum knows so little about Scottish national dress as far as the sgian dubh is concerned. I don't think I would want them to teach me about my heritage, I wouldn't know whether the information was accurate or not.
Peter
-
-
18th July 07, 05:40 PM
#17
Originally Posted by Peter C.
It is worrying to think a clan museum knows so little about Scottish national dress as far as the sgian dubh is concerned. I don't think I would want them to teach me about my heritage, I wouldn't know whether the information was accurate or not.
Peter
I know what you mean...
from: http://www.sonasmor.net/Panel003.html
The two clansmen standing at the side of the shield are known as 'supporters' in heraldic terms. They are dressed as they may have appeared at the famous Battle of the Shirts or Blàr-na-Leine in 1544 between the Camerons and MacDonalds vs the Frasers. Because of the extremely hot weather that day, the combatants cast aside their belted plaids and fought in just their shirts and jerkins. It was the style of that day in the Highlands to tie the shirt tails between their thighs.
I thought 1594 was the earliest documentation of the "belted plaid?" Some things you just have to take as a grain of salt.
----------------------------------------------[URL="http://www.youtube.com/sirdaniel1975"]
My Youtube Page[/URL]
-
-
18th July 07, 06:44 PM
#18
MacPherson, oh yeah. I like this thread.
Wallace Catanach, Kiltmaker
A day without killting is like a day without sunshine.
-
-
19th July 07, 01:05 AM
#19
I may be wrong, but another thing about transportation, at least for some, meant that you could never return without incurring the death penalty.
Remember Magwitch in Great Expectations? Played so admirably by the great Scots actor Finlay Currie in the David Lean version!
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
19th July 07, 02:08 AM
#20
I came across this , regarding transportation , and the death penalty
"1754, July 28. Elizabeth Canning is ordered to be transported to some of his Majesty’s American colonies, and has been delivered to the merchant who contracted with the court, to be transported accordingly. And ’tis certain that in case she be found at large in this Kingdom before the expiration of seven years, she will be liable to the pains of death."
http://www.dinsdoc.com/butler-1.htm
It records of Scots being shipped , but no specific mention of the proscription , as yet .
Just found lists of names from the mid 1600's
http://www.electricscotland.com/hist..._prisoners.htm
Last edited by Quaich Maker; 19th July 07 at 02:50 AM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Pour1Malt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 23
Last Post: 2nd July 07, 12:15 PM
-
By auld argonian in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 9
Last Post: 2nd August 06, 12:54 PM
-
By An t-Ileach in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 13
Last Post: 30th December 05, 04:38 PM
-
By davedove in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 10
Last Post: 28th July 05, 04:26 AM
-
By Graham in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 15
Last Post: 31st July 04, 05:40 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks