Military issue 182-96-108

[ChattanCat]

Thanks Jay.

[James MacMillan]

Just trying to maintain the high quality of accuracy that is normally available on this fine forum.............

[macwilkin]

Repeating my earlier question to gilmore (who may not have seen it):

What regiment/tartan is the kilt, and what other information is on the label? Inquiring minds want tae ken!

T.

[Amoskeag]

You are all wrong!
This is an ancient tally system used to pass on critical data from one kilt wearer to the next kilt wearer.

That's pretty funny

[Nervous Jock]

It's in cm
Height-waist-seat.

Thats right.

I have a kilt thats 188-96-112, this is the largest size before "special made to order" (or at least was).

historically the sizes were just numbered size 6, Size 7 size 8 etc. this meant it was nigh on impossible for someone without stores experience to tell if they were getting the right sized kit. It changed to this metric basis late 80's early 90's IIRC

[macwilkin]

Now if gilmore would only tell us which regiment the kilt is from...

T.

[Nervous Jock]

Now if gilmore would only tell us which regiment the kilt is from...

T.

Even it you aren't a great tartan spotter it should say on the label