I've seen a couple of guys wearing kilts with whatever-packs (don't want to offend anyone), and, frankly, they looked OK to me. In fact, I loaned a kilt to my daughter's boyfriend one time, and all I had to offer was a small whatever-pack, and he looked fine. In fact, it didn't look much different.
Having said that, a problem with the pack as opposed to the sporran is that it won't fall down between the knees for purposes of modesty when one sits. Standing they're fine, but I don't care to end up like the guy next to the queen in that famous photo. (the curious can look here: http://urbanlegends.about.com/librar...s_soldiers.htm.
I've also seen the packs and sporrans worn to the side (as they often were in auld lang syne), and they don't look too bad either. I only do that if I dance with a lady or play a guitar.
Bottom line, it is traditional to wear a sporran in the front these days, and, if you do, no one will pay the least attention. If dressed casually, a ***-pack probably won't be noticed if worn in front or a bit to the side, and it is practical.
I like sporrans, and now that I have several, that's what I prefer. I don't wear whatever-packs, but I'm sure they look good on you. (Think Rodney Dangerfield.)
Jim Killman
Writer, Philosopher, Teacher of English and Math, Soldier of Fortune, Bon Vivant, Heart Transplant Recipient, Knight of St. Andrew (among other knighthoods)
Freedom is not free, but the US Marine Corps will pay most of your share.
Bookmarks